From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kbuild: implement several W= levels
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:20:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110422102028.GA8324@liondog.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110422101524.GA20671@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Hi Sam,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:15:24PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Borislav.
>
> > > the patch is only an RFC - and is not made on top
> > > of an upstream kernel with no additiona stuff applied.
> >
> > Thanks for doing this, a couple of suggestions below.
> ...
>
> You already spend more time analysing this than it took me
> to write the patch.
> Can I persuade you to implement the various W= levels based
> on your analysis and send to Michal for merging?
> You can use my v2 PATCH as inspiration.
>
> Please take authorship on the patch as the main work
> is to decide what warnings belongs to which level.
>
> [Snipped - lots of good comments]
thanks but according to Documentation/SubmittingPatches, the _initial_
author is the author of the patch. Besides, I just had the talk with
Ingo the other day on how to acknowledge multuple authors so I'm not
making the same mistake again :).
But seriously, let me add my comments to your patch while they're fresh
in my head and let's see what we come up with in our combined and
perfectly orchestrated effort :).
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-22 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-21 21:39 [RFC PATCH] kbuild: implement several W= levels Sam Ravnborg
2011-04-21 21:58 ` Joe Perches
2011-04-21 22:56 ` Stratos Psomadakis
2011-04-21 22:06 ` Stratos Psomadakis
2011-04-22 1:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-04-22 7:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2] " Sam Ravnborg
2011-04-22 8:19 ` [RFC PATCH] " Borislav Petkov
2011-04-22 10:15 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-04-22 10:20 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2011-04-22 10:46 ` [PATCH v3] " Borislav Petkov
2011-04-22 11:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-04-22 17:50 ` [PATCH v3.1] " Borislav Petkov
2011-04-26 19:52 ` Michal Marek
2011-04-26 20:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-04-27 8:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-04-27 8:25 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-04-27 11:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-04-27 20:15 ` [PATCH v3.2] " Borislav Petkov
2011-04-27 20:21 ` Joe Perches
2011-04-27 20:46 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-04-27 20:46 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-04-28 16:18 ` Michal Marek
2011-04-28 0:25 ` [PATCH v3.1] " Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-04-28 16:24 ` Michal Marek
2011-04-28 17:59 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-04-29 13:31 ` [PATCH] kbuild: Allow to combine multiple " Michal Marek
2011-04-29 17:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-04-29 18:13 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-04-29 18:27 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-04-29 18:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-02 15:38 ` Michal Marek
2011-05-02 15:53 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-05-02 16:05 ` Michal Marek
2011-05-02 16:17 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-05-02 16:16 ` Américo Wang
2011-05-02 17:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-05-02 17:34 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-05-02 18:03 ` boris
2011-05-02 18:45 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-05-02 18:51 ` boris
2011-05-02 20:35 ` Michal Marek
2011-04-27 8:27 ` [PATCH v3] kbuild: implement several " Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110422102028.GA8324@liondog.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox