From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:43829 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932095Ab1EMMVU (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2011 08:21:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:21:12 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kconfig: autogenerated config_is_xxx macro Message-ID: <20110513122112.GA469@elte.hu> References: <1304658229-30820-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <20110507015041.GA21017@game.jcrosoft.org> <4DC7AB57.9050002@suse.cz> <20110513080909.GO18952@game.jcrosoft.org> <20110513083013.GC13647@elte.hu> <20110513083652.GP18952@game.jcrosoft.org> <20110513100152.GN13647@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Michal Marek , Arnaud Lacombe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar * Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > >> On 10:30 Fri 13 May     , Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > > >> > * Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > >> > > >> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_BIOS > >> > > - if (!rt->signature) { > >> > > + if (config_is_pci_bios() && !rt->signature) { > >> > > >> > Makes sense - but please name it in a more obvious way, such as: > >> > > >> >     pci_bios_enabled() > >> the idea to generate the macro via Kconfig > > > > Okay, and there we are stuck with whatever the Kconfig name is. (we could > > rename that but not needed really) > > > > Why not the canonical config_pci_bios() variant? It's the shortest one to > > write. The '_is' looks pretty superfluous to me. > > > > Hm, i guess it could be mixed up with a function that configures the pci_bios. > > > > I guess since i don't have any better idea config_is_pci_bios() sounds like a > > good choice after all. > > But we don't name config options like CONFIG_IS_PCI_BIOS, do we? The problem is that 'config' can be misunderstood as a verb - it's often used for function names to say 'to configure'. By naming it 'config_is_()' it unambiguously becomes a noun. Thanks, Ingo