From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com>
To: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
Linux Kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] builddeb: remove unneeded explicit Architecture
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 19:40:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905164009.GM18204@xorcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120905151422.GD12713@stro.at>
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:14:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, Michal Marek wrote:
>
> > On 5.9.2012 15:05, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your reply,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 03:50:10PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> > >> Adding Max to CC.
> > >>
> > >> On 14.8.2012 12:44, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > >>> Architecture was set explicitly in debian/control for one of the three
> > >>> packages (linux-libc-dev) but not for the other two. When cross-building
> > >>> it gives me an error:
> > >>>
> > >>> dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not
> > >>> appear in package's architecture list (amd64)
> > >>>
> > >>> Also note that if used, dpkg --print-architecture should have been
> > >>> replaced with dpkg-architecture.
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> scripts/package/builddeb | 3 +--
> > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb
> > >>> index acb8650..d9c71a6 100644
> > >>> --- a/scripts/package/builddeb
> > >>> +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb
> > >>> @@ -252,13 +252,12 @@ mkdir -p "$destdir"
> > >>> (cd $objtree; tar -c -f - -T "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles") | (cd $destdir; tar -xf -)
> > >>> ln -sf "/usr/src/linux-headers-$version" "$kernel_headers_dir/lib/modules/$version/build"
> > >>> rm -f "$objtree/debian/hdrsrcfiles" "$objtree/debian/hdrobjfiles"
> > >>> -arch=$(dpkg --print-architecture)
> > >>>
> > >>> cat <<EOF >> debian/control
> > >>>
> > >>> Package: $kernel_headers_packagename
> > >>> Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6
> > >>> -Architecture: $arch
> > >>> +Architecture: any
> > >>> Description: Linux kernel headers for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch
> > >>> This package provides kernel header files for $KERNELRELEASE on $arch
> > >>> .
> > >>
> > >> As the package contains files from arch/$SRCARCH/include, I doubt that
> > >> this is a valid change.
> > >
> > > But you optionally force the Architecture later on in build_package.
> > > "Arhcitecture: any" in the source package states that the binary package
> > > will be the one stated by the build system.
> >
> > Ah, OK. I don't know much about Debian packaging in fact. Max, could you
> > have a look? The original thread is here:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/14/133. I meant to add you to CC before,
> > but apparently I forgot.
>
> yes indeed it is an invalid change.
> Cross building shouldn't need it, what did you exactly try?
$ grep CROSS_COMPILE .config
CONFIG_CROSS_COMPILE="arm-linux-gnueabihf-"
Command:
KBUILD_DEBARCH=armhf make ARCH=arm KBUILD_IMAGE=uImage deb-pkg
Error I get:
dpkg-gencontrol: error: current host architecture 'armhf' does not
appear in package's architecture list (amd64)
It seems I have to use KBUILD_DEBARCH, as the kernel build system can't
really tell if I want armel or armhf (If I built the same kernel for a
Squeeze system I would have been forced to use armel).
After I apply the patch, I can build the packages with no problem. The
generated linux-libc-dev file has "Architecture: armhf".
Below is debian/control at the time the error message was generated:
Source: linux-upstream
Section: kernel
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir@debian.org>
Standards-Version: 3.8.4
Homepage: http://www.kernel.org/
Package: linux-image-3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+
Provides: linux-image, linux-image-2.6, linux-modules-3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+
Suggests: linux-firmware-image
Architecture: any
Description: Linux kernel, version 3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+
This package contains the Linux kernel, modules and corresponding other
files, version: 3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+.
Package: linux-headers-3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+
Provides: linux-headers, linux-headers-2.6
Architecture: amd64
Description: Linux kernel headers for 3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+ on amd64
This package provides kernel header files for 3.6.0-rc4-cm-t3730+ on amd64
.
This is useful for people who need to build external modules
Package: linux-libc-dev
Section: devel
Provides: linux-kernel-headers
Architecture: any
Description: Linux support headers for userspace development
This package provides userspaces headers from the Linux kernel. These headers
are used by the installed headers for GNU glibc and other system libraries.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com iax:guest@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-14 10:44 [PATCH] builddeb: remove unneeded explicit Architecture Tzafrir Cohen
2012-08-31 13:50 ` Michal Marek
2012-09-05 13:05 ` Tzafrir Cohen
2012-09-05 13:26 ` Michal Marek
2012-09-05 15:14 ` maximilian attems
2012-09-05 16:40 ` Tzafrir Cohen [this message]
2012-09-05 20:26 ` maximilian attems
2012-09-06 14:00 ` maximilian attems
2012-09-06 14:04 ` maximilian attems
2012-09-06 16:21 ` Tzafrir Cohen
2012-09-07 0:02 ` maximilian attems
2012-09-09 11:54 ` Tzafrir Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120905164009.GM18204@xorcom.com \
--to=tzafrir.cohen@xorcom.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max@stro.at \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox