From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bar.sig21.net ([80.81.252.164]:38407 "EHLO bar.sig21.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751146Ab3BELl0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:41:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:39:29 +0100 From: Johannes Stezenbach Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add support for LZ4-compressed kernels Message-ID: <20130205113929.GA18049@sig21.net> References: <1359179447-31118-1-git-send-email-kyungsik.lee@lge.com> <20130128142510.68092e10.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20130130102353.GA8925@sig21.net> <510F16C9.2060901@oberhumer.com> <20130204105052.GA17786@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130204105052.GA17786@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" , Nicolas Pitre , Andrew Morton , Kyungsik Lee , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Michal Marek , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Nitin Gupta , Richard Purdie , Josh Triplett , Joe Millenbach , Albin Tonnerre , hyojun.im@lge.com, chan.jeong@lge.com, gunho.lee@lge.com, minchan.kim@lge.com, namhyung.kim@lge.com, raphael.andy.lee@gmail.com, CE Linux Developers List On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:50:52AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 03:02:49AM +0100, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > > At least akpm did approve the LZO update for inclusion into 3.7, but the code > > still has not been merged into the main tree. > > > On 2012-10-09 21:26, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > [...] > > > The changes look OK to me. Please ask Stephen to include the tree in > > > linux-next, for a 3.7 merge. > > > > Well, this probably means I have done a rather poor marketing. > > I assume this code is sitting in *your* tree? How do you think it gets > into mainline? > > There is no automatic way that code from linux-next gets merged into > mainline. That is up to the tree owner to make happen, either by getting > their tree into a parent maintainers tree, or if there is none, asking > Linus to pull your tree at the appropriate time. My feeling is that in this case it is unneccessarily hard for an outside contributor to get a patch accepted, all because get_maintainer.pl doesn't put someone in charge. Apparently it doesn't work to put all the usual maintainer responsibilities onto the shoulders of a Linux development novice. Thus it would be nice if some maintainer would come forward and offer to handle the patches for Markus. Thanks, Johannes