public inbox for linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Subject: randconfig bug when used with KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:41:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130227214102.6d63544d@skate> (raw)

Hello,

I'd like to report that the randconfig code seems to have a bug when it
is given a set of fixed values using KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG: it forgets to
randomize choice values.

Take the following Config.test.in:

-----8<----------8<------------8<----------
config OPTIONA
       bool "Option A"

choice
	prompt "This is a choice"

config CHOICE_OPTIONA
	bool "Choice Option A"

config CHOICE_OPTIONB
	bool "Choice Option B"

endchoice

config OPTIONB
       bool "Option B"
-----8<----------8<------------8<----------

If you do (using the kernel's kconfig):

 ./scripts/kconfig/conf --randconfig Config.test.in

you will see that the generated .config file properly randomizes all
options, including CHOICE_OPTIONA and CHOICE_OPTIONB.

Now, if we create a partial .config (named orig.config) file to set
the value of some options:

-----8<----------8<------------8<----------
CONFIG_OPTIONA=y
-----8<----------8<------------8<----------

If you do:

 KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG=orig.config ./scripts/kconfig/conf --randconfig Config.test.in

and look at the resulting .config, you will see that:

 * CONFIG_OPTIONA is always set to y, which is OK.

 * CONFIG_OPTIONB is properly randomized

 * But in the choice, it's always CONFIG_CHOICE_OPTIONA that will be
   selected, and never CONFIG_CHOICE_OPTIONB. The randomization for
   choices doesn't work as soon as a file is passed as
   KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG.

As you can see, the randomization of choices does not work properly
when KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG is used.

I've looked a little bit in the code, and in the following piece of
code from confdata.c:

	for_all_symbols(i, csym) {
		if (sym_has_value(csym) || !sym_is_choice(csym))
			continue;

		sym_calc_value(csym);
		if (mode == def_random)
			randomize_choice_values(csym);
		else
			set_all_choice_values(csym);
	}

which is normally responsible for randomizing choice values,
sym_has_value(csym) returns true for all choice options when
KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG is used, which explains why the choices are not
randomized. I haven't found out though why the kconfig code thinks that
all choice values already have a value, even though no value has been
passed through the KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG file.

Any hints? Or patch to test?

Thanks,

Thomas Petazzoni
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

             reply	other threads:[~2013-02-27 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-27 20:41 Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-03-03 20:01 ` randconfig bug when used with KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG Thomas Petazzoni
2013-03-10 16:01 ` [PATCH] kconfig: do randomise choice entries in presence of KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG Yann E. MORIN
2013-03-11 21:40   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-03-13 18:27   ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-04-08 11:52   ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-04-09 12:02     ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-04-10 21:20 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-04-11  9:44   ` Michal Marek
2013-04-11  9:58     ` Yann E. MORIN

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130227214102.6d63544d@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox