From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50439 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756744Ab3D3WHE (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:07:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:06:47 -0400 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: rcu: Provide compile-time control for no-CBs CPUs Message-ID: <20130430220647.GA16524@redhat.com> References: <20130430214826.GK3780@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130430214826.GK3780@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , paul.mckenney@linaro.org, mmarek@suse.cz, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 02:48:26PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Should I add this to the Kconfig help text? My guess is "not all of it", > but figured I should ask. The commit msg would have been a great place for much of it, especially the part explaining your desire to have users kick the tires etc. > See below for my current best guess. Much better. Be sure to pass on the 'terrible kconfig' award to the next lucky recipient when their time comes :) Dave