From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from asavdk4.altibox.net ([109.247.116.15]:47030 "EHLO asavdk4.altibox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752511AbaBSGHh (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:07:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 07:07:17 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: linux-next Message-ID: <20140219060717.GA25806@ravnborg.org> References: <5303C695.4030403@converseincode.com> <20140219111753.23912fa4bdbfeba7aa6a6c52@canb.auug.org.au> <53041454.6090404@converseincode.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53041454.6090404@converseincode.com> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Behan Webster Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Michal Marek , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Jan-Simon =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?= > >>The LLVMLinux project is working on changes to the LLVM/clang toolchain > >>as well as to the linux kernel code in order to be able to compile the > >>kernel with clang. > >I have no objection to this, but would like to see more of these patches > >reviewed by (among others) the kbuild guys (cc'd). I also could not find > >some of these patches published on lkml (where I would expect to see > >them). And the top patch has a very uninformative commit message :-( > Of course. That is the intention. I'll review all the commit > messages as well. Please send the patches as least to linux-kbuild for review. I almost never go hunting for patches in a git repo for review, and this is the same for others. Sam