public inbox for linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: document KBUILD_SHELL
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:02:43 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140626110242.79E5.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5396F868.1090609@suse.cz>

Hi Michal, Sam,


On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:22:00 +0200
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:

> On 2014-06-10 14:02, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> > 
> > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:36:48 +0200
> > Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 2014-06-10 13:17, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >>> IMHO:
> >>> If all shell scripts invoked by $KBUILD_SHELL should be sh-compatible,
> >>>  "KBUILD_SHELL" should always be set to "/bin/sh" and
> >>> users should not change it.
> >>>
> >>> I still don't understand why bash is preferable for KBUILD_SHELL.
> >>
> >> I'm just speculating, but the reason might have been that if you are
> >> compiling Linux on some oddball UNIX system, the POSIX shell might not
> >> be "/bin/sh", but some other path, who knows which. But if $BASH is
> >> defined or if there is /bin/bash, then it's very likely the familiar GNU
> >> Bash. Hence the preference. Of course, the side effect is that it makes
> >> it easy to introduce bash-only constructs into the scripts :-/.
> > 
> > Hmm, 
> > We set the default value to /bin/sh  (KBUILD_SHELL ?= /bin/sh)
> > but allowing oddball system users to override it like,
> > export  KBUILD_SHELL=/bin/bash; make
> > 
> > Does this sounds reasonable?
> 
> I'm not against it in principle, but it will have to wait for the next
> merge window, so that it sees more testing in linux-next. I'd like to
> push the current set of changes to Linus and time is getting tight.
> 
> Michal


Now the merge window is closed, so I'd like to resume this topic.

Before that, I have a question.
Sam mentioned as follows:

On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 13:40:10 +0200
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> All shell scripts that are invoked with $(CONFIG_SHELL) must be sh-compatible,
> or in practice dash compatible as well as bash compatible.
> The preference is bash as expressed with the above code.


I notice at least two files (scripts/coccicheck and scripts/mkuboot.sh)
have shebang "#!/bin/bash" even though they are invoked with $(CONFIG_SHELL).

Should we change them to "#!/bin/sh" ?

In that case, we also have to modify some lines where bash-extension
is used.

COCCIINCLUDE=${LINUXINCLUDE//-I/-I }
COCCIINCLUDE=${COCCIINCLUDE//-include/-I}

I think fixing them is not difficult.



Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-26  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-10  2:51 [PATCH] kbuild: document KBUILD_SHELL Masahiro Yamada
2014-06-10  9:27 ` Michal Marek
2014-06-10  9:50   ` Sam Ravnborg
2014-06-10 11:00     ` Michal Marek
2014-06-10 11:17       ` Masahiro Yamada
2014-06-10 11:36         ` Michal Marek
2014-06-10 12:02           ` Masahiro Yamada
2014-06-10 12:22             ` Michal Marek
2014-06-10 12:55               ` Masahiro Yamada
2014-06-26  2:02               ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2014-07-04 22:01                 ` Michal Marek
2014-06-10 19:56           ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140626110242.79E5.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com \
    --to=yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox