From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.102]:36141 "EHLO e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753378AbbK3Iw5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 03:52:57 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp06.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:52:55 -0000 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:52:51 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: add AFLAGS_REMOVE_(basename).o option Message-ID: <20151130085251.GC4045@osiris> References: <1448103599-6660-1-git-send-email-heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> <1448103599-6660-2-git-send-email-heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> <20151130081708.GA4045@osiris> <565C0A8D.2010900@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <565C0A8D.2010900@suse.com> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Michal Marek Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:36:29AM +0100, Michal Marek wrote: > >> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.lib b/scripts/Makefile.lib > >> index 79e86613712f..26a48d76eb9d 100644 > >> --- a/scripts/Makefile.lib > >> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.lib > >> @@ -104,8 +104,9 @@ modname_flags = $(if $(filter 1,$(words $(modname))),\ > >> orig_c_flags = $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) $(KBUILD_SUBDIR_CCFLAGS) \ > >> $(ccflags-y) $(CFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) > >> _c_flags = $(filter-out $(CFLAGS_REMOVE_$(basetarget).o), $(orig_c_flags)) > >> -_a_flags = $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(KBUILD_AFLAGS) $(KBUILD_SUBDIR_ASFLAGS) \ > >> +orig_a_flags = $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(KBUILD_AFLAGS) $(KBUILD_SUBDIR_ASFLAGS) \ > >> $(asflags-y) $(AFLAGS_$(basetarget).o) > >> +_a_flags = $(filter-out $(AFLAGS_REMOVE_$(basetarget).o), $(orig_a_flags)) > >> _cpp_flags = $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(cppflags-y) $(CPPFLAGS_$(@F)) > >> > >> # > > > > Hello Michal, > > > > since I didn't hear anything from you, I'll simply add this to the s390 tree. > > The patch should be trivial enough and is certainly not controversial. > > Hi Heiko, > > yes, please go ahead, the patch is fine. Ok, thanks. I'll add your ack then.