From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:36808 "EHLO mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751363AbcDZRbM (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:31:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:31:06 -0700 From: Alexei Starovoitov Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH V2 3/5] samples/bpf: add a README file to get users started Message-ID: <20160426173105.GD42777@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com> References: <20160426162650.22962.20516.stgit@firesoul> <20160426162721.22962.25054.stgit@firesoul> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160426162721.22962.25054.stgit@firesoul> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, bblanco@plumgrid.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, borkmann@iogearbox.net On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:27:22PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > + > +Manually compiling LLVM with 'bpf' support > +------------------------------------------ > + > +In some LLVM versions the BPF target were marked experimental. They > +needed the 'cmake .. -DLLVM_EXPERIMENTAL_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=BPF'. Since > +version 3.7.1, LLVM adds a proper LLVM backend target for the BPF > +bytecode architecture. it's actually non-experimental since 3.7.0. It was experimental after 3.6 was released during development of 3.7. I doubt you can find this anywhere, so I suggest to just drop this paragraph.