From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:38770 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751975AbcFUOPt (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:15:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 05:58:07 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] Add the latent_entropy gcc plugin Message-ID: <20160621125807.GA19065@infradead.org> References: <20160620203910.a8b6b5b10d18f24661916e7b@gmail.com> <20160620204119.6299c961570a7a9ad6cbdd51@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160620204119.6299c961570a7a9ad6cbdd51@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Emese Revfy Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, pageexec@freemail.hu, spender@grsecurity.net, mmarek@suse.com, keescook@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bart.vanassche@sandisk.com, davem@davemloft.net On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:41:19PM +0200, Emese Revfy wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/scripts/gcc-plugins/latent_entropy_plugin.c > @@ -0,0 +1,639 @@ > +/* > + * Copyright 2012-2016 by the PaX Team > + * Copyright 2016 by Emese Revfy > + * Licensed under the GPL v2 > + * > + * Note: the choice of the license means that the compilation process is > + * NOT 'eligible' as defined by gcc's library exception to the GPL v3, > + * but for the kernel it doesn't matter since it doesn't link against > + * any of the gcc libraries I remember we used to have architectures that actually linked against libgcc. Isn't that the case anymore?