From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Davidson <md@google.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Stephen Hines <srhines@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bernhard.Rosenkranzer@linaro.org,
Peter Foley <pefoley2@pefoley.com>,
Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] x86/build: Specify stack alignment for clang
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:37:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170619183757.124992-4-mka@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170619183757.124992-1-mka@chromium.org>
For gcc stack alignment is configured with -mpreferred-stack-boundary=N,
clang has the option -mstack-alignment=N for that purpose. Use the same
alignment as with gcc.
If the alignment is not specified clang assumes an alignment of
16 bytes, as required by the standard ABI. However as mentioned in
d9b0cde91c60 ("x86-64, gcc: Use -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 if
supported") the standard kernel entry on x86-64 leaves the stack
on an 8-byte boundary, as a consequence clang will keep the stack
misaligned.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
---
arch/x86/Makefile | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
index b2dae639f778..9406d3670452 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -11,6 +11,14 @@ else
KBUILD_DEFCONFIG := $(ARCH)_defconfig
endif
+# Handle different option names for specifying stack alignment with gcc and
+# clang.
+ifeq ($(cc-name),clang)
+ cc_stack_align_opt := -mstack-alignment
+else
+ cc_stack_align_opt := -mpreferred-stack-boundary
+endif
+
# How to compile the 16-bit code. Note we always compile for -march=i386;
# that way we can complain to the user if the CPU is insufficient.
#
@@ -28,7 +36,7 @@ REALMODE_CFLAGS := $(M16_CFLAGS) -g -Os -D__KERNEL__ \
REALMODE_CFLAGS += $(call __cc-option, $(CC), $(REALMODE_CFLAGS), -ffreestanding)
REALMODE_CFLAGS += $(call __cc-option, $(CC), $(REALMODE_CFLAGS), -fno-stack-protector)
-REALMODE_CFLAGS += $(call __cc-option, $(CC), $(REALMODE_CFLAGS), -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2)
+REALMODE_CFLAGS += $(call __cc-option, $(CC), $(REALMODE_CFLAGS), $(cc_stack_align_opt)=2)
export REALMODE_CFLAGS
# BITS is used as extension for files which are available in a 32 bit
@@ -65,8 +73,10 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_32),y)
# with nonstandard options
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-pic
- # prevent gcc from keeping the stack 16 byte aligned
- KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2)
+ # Align the stack to the register width instead of using the default
+ # alignment of 16 bytes. This reduces stack usage and the number of
+ # alignment instructions.
+ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,$(cc_stack_align_opt)=2)
# Disable unit-at-a-time mode on pre-gcc-4.0 compilers, it makes gcc use
# a lot more stack due to the lack of sharing of stacklots:
@@ -98,8 +108,14 @@ else
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-80387)
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-fp-ret-in-387)
- # Use -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 if supported.
- KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mpreferred-stack-boundary=3)
+ # By default gcc and clang use a stack alignment of 16 bytes for x86.
+ # However the standard kernel entry on x86-64 leaves the stack on an
+ # 8-byte boundary. If the compiler isn't informed about the actual
+ # alignment it will generate extra alignment instructions for the
+ # default alignment which keep the stack *mis*aligned.
+ # Furthermore an alignment to the register width reduces stack usage
+ # and the number of alignment instructions.
+ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,$(cc_stack_align_opt)=3)
# Use -mskip-rax-setup if supported.
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mskip-rax-setup)
--
2.13.1.518.g3df882009-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-19 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-19 18:37 [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: stack alignment for boot code and clang Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-06-19 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] kbuild: Add __cc-option macro Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-06-20 9:37 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-06-19 18:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] x86/build: Use __cc-option for boot code compiler options Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-06-19 18:37 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2017-06-19 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] x86/build: Specify stack alignment for clang hpa
2017-06-19 20:47 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-06-20 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-20 17:37 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-06-21 7:18 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170619183757.124992-4-mka@chromium.org \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=Bernhard.Rosenkranzer@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=behanw@converseincode.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ghackmann@google.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=md@google.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mmarek@suse.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=pefoley2@pefoley.com \
--cc=srhines@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox