Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kconfig: menuconfig make "selected by:" readable

[Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com>]

Hi Masahiro,

> Hi Petr,

> 2017-04-03 18:35 GMT+09:00 Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>:
> > Hi,

> >> rev_dep expressions can get rather unwieldy, especially if a symbol is
> >> selected by more than a handful of other symbols. Ie, it's possible to
> >> have near endless expressions like:
> >>    A && B && !C || D || F && (G || H) || [...]

> >> Chop these expressions into actually readable chunks:
> >>    - A && B && !C
> >>    - D
> >>    - F && (G || H)
> >>    - [...]

> >> Ie, transform the top level "||" tokens into newlines and prepend each
> >> line with a minus. This makes the "Selected by:" blurb much easier to
> >> read.

> >> This also prevents trimming too long lines.

> >> Based on patch from Paul Bolle.
<snip>

> > Any comment on this patch, please?


> I noticed you added me in the To: list.
Thank you for your comments.
I'm sorry, it took me rather long time to reply.

> Basically I think this patch is a nice idea,
> but I am not a Kconfig maintainer.  Sorry.
> (I could pick up a really trivial one via kbuild tree somehow,
> but I want this one to be handled by a person with expertise in the area.)

> Yann E. MORIN is the Kconfig maintainer, but he has been
> silent for a few years. I guess Kconfig needs a new maintainer.
Well, Yann is still listed in MAINTAINERS file, even he's inactive (according to the date
of his git tree).


> Please take my comment just as a Kconfig user's point of view.

> The git-log only mentions "select", but I notice this patch
> also changes "depends on" format in a bit different way.

> For example,

> General setup  --->
>      Kernel compression mode (Gzip)  --->


> shows its help like this:

>   Depends on: HAVE_KERNEL_GZIP  [=y]
>   - HAVE_KERNEL_BZIP2 [=n]
>   - HAVE_KERNEL_LZMA [=y]
>   - HAVE_KERNEL_XZ [=y]
>   - HAVE_KERNEL_LZO [=y]
>   - HAVE_KERNEL_LZ4 [=y]

> (the first dependency in the same line in the "Depends on")

You're right, I overlooked it. Do you think it makes sense use it also for "Depends on"
section?


Kind regards,
Petr