public inbox for linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	Konrad Schwarz <konrad.schwarz@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] builddeb: introduce variables for control-file customization
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:01:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171204100150.1f040839@md1em3qc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512154058.2811.4.camel@decadent.org.uk>

Am Fri, 1 Dec 2017 18:47:38 +0000
schrieb Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>:

> On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 19:34 +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> > Am Fri, 1 Dec 2017 16:51:12 +0000
> > schrieb Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>:
> >   
> > > On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 15:56 +0000, Henning Schild wrote:  
> > > > The debian packages coming out of "make *deb-pkg" lack some
> > > > critical information in the control-files e.g. the "Depends:"
> > > > field. If one tries to install a fresh system with such a
> > > > "linux-image" debootstrap or multistrap might try to install
> > > > the kernel before its deps and the package hooks will fail.    
> > > 
> > > I assume you're talking about those hook scripts being run while
> > > the packages they belong to are only unpacked?  I hadn't thought
> > > about this issue, but it seems to me that those hook scripts
> > > generally ought to be fixed to handle this case properly.  Most
> > > of the packages installing hook scripts for kernel packages are
> > > not going to be dependencies of linux-image packages, so it will
> > > never be safe for them to assume their package has been fully
> > > installed.  
> > 
> > Yes these hook scripts fail when installing the kernel on another
> > system. Indeed we seem to have a case where packages installed on
> > the build-machine cause install-time deps for the package.  
> 
> Can you give an example?  I don't see how that would happen.

Scripts in /etc/kernel/ will end up as hooks for the kernel-package, if
you do not set KDEB_HOOKDIR. Looking at an example system that pulls in
things like "pm-utils, grub-pc .. initramfs". With this mechanism any
package placing a hook in /etc/kernel can influence the deps. I guess
in practice that is prevented with policies on what these scripts are
allowed to do.

> > In my case the build-machine is pretty minimal but i still want
> > some of that i.e. initramfs.
> >   
> > > > Different debian-based distros use different values for the
> > > > missing fields. And the values differ between distro versions
> > > > as well. So hardcoding of e.g. "Depends" is not possible.    
> > > 
> > > The dependencies also depend on the kernel configuration.  (And a
> > > custom kernel built with 'make deb-pkg' often won't have any
> > > dependencies outside of essential packages.)  
> > 
> > In fact it does not have any at the moment, there is no essential.
> > Or maybe that is hidden in debian-magic.  
> [...]
> 
> Essential packages are always installed, which means there is no need
> to declare a dependency on them (in fact it is discouraged):
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#dependencies

Ok, i will need to double-check how multistrap deals with those.

Henning

> Ben.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-04  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-27 16:13 [PATCH] builddeb: introduce variables for control-file customization Henning Schild
2017-11-27 23:57 ` Jim Davis
2017-11-28  8:41   ` Henning Schild
2017-12-01 16:51 ` Ben Hutchings
2017-12-01 18:34   ` Henning Schild
2017-12-01 18:47     ` Ben Hutchings
2017-12-04  9:01       ` Henning Schild [this message]
2017-12-04 13:15         ` Riku Voipio
2017-12-04 14:35         ` Ben Hutchings
2017-12-04 16:48 ` [PATCH v2] scripts: builddeb: allow customization of "Depends:" fields Henning Schild
2017-12-04 16:50   ` Henning Schild

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171204100150.1f040839@md1em3qc \
    --to=henning.schild@siemens.com \
    --cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=konrad.schwarz@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox