Re: [PATCH 2/2] kconfig: Print the value of each reverse dependency

Ulf Magnusson
2018-02-17T17:31:50Z

On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:09:50AM +0100, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
>> IMO, we could take this as is (after addressing other people's
>> comments), since it's already a big improvement, and then add sorting
>> later if we feel like it.
>>
>> Don't have to do everything at once. :)
>
> I agree that it's not possible to do everything perfect right from the
> start. But since we are changing the user experience, I just thought
> that we would first like to see how both implementations (prefixed
> vs grouped tokens) look like, then make a decision (I'm still open
> minded about it), then affect the users.

Isn't the latest patchset doing both? That seems like the best of both worlds.

And yeah, I just get some personal restlessness when good stuff floats
around for a long time without getting in. :)

Cheers,
Ulf