From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Disable extra debugging info in .s output
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 13:39:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190210123923.GA14948@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAT+GhbEwP7v7NWd2kqW76qbXM1mtKhc21YXkp7BUJjzKQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 03:51:01PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> I am still wondering,
> but if this is really worth doing in upstream code,
Yes, it is very worth doing it:
make <path-to-file>.s
is one of the basic steps one does when trying to pinpoint the Code:
line in a splat back to the code gcc generated.
> I think the following is a simpler idea.
Yes, you can do it this way too but I can't apply it here to play with
it because gmail probably corrupted the diff:
checking file Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 729.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED
checking file scripts/Makefile.build
patch: **** malformed patch at line 98: $(DISABLE_LTO) -fverbose-asm -S -o $@ $<
Please attach the diff or send it from another mail server.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-10 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-21 9:53 [PATCH] kbuild: Disable extra debugging info in .s output Borislav Petkov
2019-01-31 11:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-01 3:06 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-01 9:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-01 10:09 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-01 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-01 11:03 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-01 10:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-01 10:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-01 11:58 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-01 15:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-02 13:48 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-02 14:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-06 10:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-10 6:51 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-10 12:39 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-02-18 8:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-18 9:10 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-18 14:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-19 23:55 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-02-01 10:51 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190210123923.GA14948@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox