From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45684 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729276AbfHNRXC (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:23:02 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: References: <20190814055108.214253-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/18] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework From: Stephen Boyd Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:23:00 -0700 Message-Id: <20190814172301.9246520665@mail.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Brendan Higgins , Frank Rowand , Greg KH , Josh Poimboeuf , Kees Cook , Kieran Bingham , Luis Chamberlain , Masahiro Yamada , Peter Zijlstra , Rob Herring , Theodore Ts'o , shuah Cc: devicetree , dri-devel , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , linux-nvdimm , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Sasha Levin , "Bird, Timothy" , Amir Goldstein , Dan Carpenter , Daniel Vetter , Jeff Dike , Joel Stanley , Julia Lawall , Kevin Hilman , Knut Omang , Logan Gunthorpe , Michael Ellerman , Petr Mladek , Randy Dunlap , Richard Weinberger , David Rientjes , Steven Rostedt , wfg@linux.intel.com, Bjorn Helgaas Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-14 03:03:47) > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:52 PM Brendan Higgins > wrote: > > > > ## TL;DR > > > > This revision addresses comments from Stephen and Bjorn Helgaas. Most > > changes are pretty minor stuff that doesn't affect the API in anyway. > > One significant change, however, is that I added support for freeing > > kunit_resource managed resources before the test case is finished via > > kunit_resource_destroy(). Additionally, Bjorn pointed out that I broke > > KUnit on certain configurations (like the default one for x86, whoops). > > > > Based on Stephen's feedback on the previous change, I think we are > > pretty close. I am not expecting any significant changes from here on > > out. >=20 > Stephen, it looks like you have just replied with "Reviewed-bys" on > all the remaining emails that you looked at. Is there anything else > that we are missing? Or is this ready for Shuah to apply? >=20 I think it's good to go! Thanks for the persistence.