From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46466 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726609AbfLSJnZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2019 04:43:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 10:43:17 +0100 From: Jessica Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] kallsyms: add names of built-in modules Message-ID: <20191219094317.GA15318@linux-8ccs> References: <7e0f4a74-63c5-ad62-c619-c6277c4bc791@oracle.com> <20191210174826.5433-1-eugene.loh@oracle.com> <2a535000-e71e-fab9-cf6a-e7e5fb8053d8@oracle.com> <20191218222931.76131c6a@rorschach.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191218222931.76131c6a@rorschach.local.home> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Eugene Loh , corbet@lwn.net, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com, michal.lkml@markovi.net, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com, tglx@linutronix.de, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, Kris Van Hees , Nick Alcock +++ Steven Rostedt [18/12/19 22:29 -0500]: >On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:55:18 -0800 >Eugene Loh wrote: > >> Ping. > >Couple of notes: > >1) this affects code that doesn't really have a maintainer. I could >take it in my tree, but I would like to have acks from other >maintainers. Perhaps Jessica Yu (Module maintainer), and probably one >from Linus himself. I hardly look through scripts/, so this patch would definitely need Masahiro's (for all things kbuild) ack as well. >2) Do not send new versions of a patch as a reply to the old version. I >and many other maintainers sort our inbox by threads, and I look at the >top of the thread for patches. That is, if there's another version of a >patch that is a reply to a previous version, it is basically off my >radar, unless I happen to notice it by chance (which I did with this >email). > >You can send your v4 patch again, but please send it as its own thread, >that way it will be on the radar of other maintainers. Hopefully we can >get some acks on this as well. Also, why wasn't this patch sent to lkml? At least I don't see it on cc. If you resend v4, please send it there as well so it can get more coverage. Thanks, Jessica