From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 56/62] gcc-10: disable 'array-bounds' warning for now
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 14:51:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200514185147.19716-56-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200514185147.19716-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 44720996e2d79e47d508b0abe99b931a726a3197 ]
This is another fine warning, related to the 'zero-length-bounds' one,
but hitting the same historical code in the kernel.
Because C didn't historically support flexible array members, we have
code that instead uses a one-sized array, the same way we have cases of
zero-sized arrays.
The one-sized arrays come from either not wanting to use the gcc
zero-sized array extension, or from a slight convenience-feature, where
particularly for strings, the size of the structure now includes the
allocation for the final NUL character.
So with a "char name[1];" at the end of a structure, you can do things
like
v = my_malloc(sizeof(struct vendor) + strlen(name));
and avoid the "+1" for the terminator.
Yes, the modern way to do that is with a flexible array, and using
'offsetof()' instead of 'sizeof()', and adding the "+1" by hand. That
also technically gets the size "more correct" in that it avoids any
alignment (and thus padding) issues, but this is another long-term
cleanup thing that will not happen for 5.7.
So disable the warning for now, even though it's potentially quite
useful. Having a slew of warnings that then hide more urgent new issues
is not an improvement.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
Makefile | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index daef13f382906..bc5e9a5fc5cbf 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -860,6 +860,7 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, stringop-truncation)
# We'll want to enable this eventually, but it's not going away for 5.7 at least
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, zero-length-bounds)
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, array-bounds)
# Enabled with W=2, disabled by default as noisy
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, maybe-uninitialized)
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-14 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-14 18:50 [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 01/62] kbuild: avoid concurrency issue in parallel building dtbs and dtbs_check Sasha Levin
2020-05-14 18:50 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 03/62] Makefile: disallow data races on gcc-10 as well Sasha Levin
2020-05-14 18:51 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 54/62] Stop the ad-hoc games with -Wno-maybe-initialized Sasha Levin
2020-05-14 18:51 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 55/62] gcc-10: disable 'zero-length-bounds' warning for now Sasha Levin
2020-05-14 18:51 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2020-05-14 18:51 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 57/62] gcc-10: disable 'stringop-overflow' " Sasha Levin
2020-05-14 18:51 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 58/62] gcc-10: disable 'restrict' " Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200514185147.19716-56-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox