From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B32C4321E for ; Sat, 7 May 2022 08:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235690AbiEGIKN (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 May 2022 04:10:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36206 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1359014AbiEGIKI (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 May 2022 04:10:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x435.google.com (mail-pf1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4812F2183C for ; Sat, 7 May 2022 01:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x435.google.com with SMTP id 204so5302219pfx.3 for ; Sat, 07 May 2022 01:06:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=aWQfnp8p3Sa/CZYziUv8sJFvgH/DhWMow1Ki0jzKInQ=; b=d7sa/vJyLfF9BR72n72H6iTcORw0kbeaXS21B2+FXdbG66FYCW7FBC02LCRup2bO0T VbztyRzKE447Dsr5bQyIcT/N6Q1+c4/IXMaJT3GrJsKz9ltWgOCmeIOcoalYl/8o+V6Q JCxhKqmLoYC0fCUjLs/ACK38p33kuWfTfdyYo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=aWQfnp8p3Sa/CZYziUv8sJFvgH/DhWMow1Ki0jzKInQ=; b=mJ7mJ5u+cAiaZXH5VFifeF8/oxQKYyRTnHOTqSS4460JqxiE97QwOOgdxrkDorOz0T lTAj/sJ/OQlmUPZL5jIYWoRNdkyb11Ucb3qCLsmceYV52iC3EpKs5Dspp1sqUrd6CPc2 fXRGEFDNIxGczOCuqvHYUqU6tUnvOMP3NUD7uoaCcv9o/zqFfpUWevHJ3WM+EEtvIpaj c2wxgA3ozMKO6jSrATafezhaWEx5n+Dg0DMXK54kb6kqumqGyHZdnu+Tot5x7tsqyBns 1mJnlpZFle6tgn0U3iarL4+Ww99tg0h/x85e8pU8Fr428LIJ9+7yJxjtCEl+Mq+tR5jf rtAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DtCfD+zh4/TP7jcOOHIQn7ARPOdm/XSFZpu1AdBcYovOwsJkA 3IVtfDMTP3ChUMA3BTA9NBU/VA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPh1ezOw2sy0EQ6kjmLgD1rSsrITTXAJHnhVIq/PJRePuQKh9Kel3rSaI68O428UlbxAszUg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6fc4:0:b0:393:9567:16dc with SMTP id k187-20020a636fc4000000b00393956716dcmr5757855pgc.593.1651910779774; Sat, 07 May 2022 01:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j192-20020a638bc9000000b003c14af505fcsm4564376pge.20.2022.05.07.01.06.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 07 May 2022 01:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 01:06:18 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/23] Rust support Message-ID: <202205070056.ACC3C3D@keescook> References: <20220507052451.12890-1-ojeda@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220507052451.12890-1-ojeda@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 07:23:58AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > ## Patch series status > > The Rust support is still to be considered experimental. However, > support is good enough that kernel developers can start working on the > Rust abstractions for subsystems and write drivers and other modules. I'd really like to see this landed for a few reasons: - It's under active development, and I'd rather review the changes "normally", incrementally, etc. Right now it can be hard to re-review some of the "mostly the same each version" patches in the series. - I'd like to break the catch-22 of "ask for a new driver to be written in rust but the rust support isn't landed" vs "the rust support isn't landed because there aren't enough drivers". It really feels like "release early, release often" is needed here; it's hard to develop against -next. :) Should we give it a try for this coming merge window? -- Kees Cook