From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D894D13F44A; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713365341; cv=none; b=f6D8IDhcPw0MssLe0jxArdGxPLBUnTj+8P7i3dzNYrwrClcOlVA0lpktiTORUL2g/bU/2xbHJhwXk9amMV8I5/pInEJEGC8L+qTqbp8V9eoA5kGKXoAKkgMCRNtqHgyJi0RYRlySEyyifTm6yacThRPrP2DnyZKb4sHSo3EqBfQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713365341; c=relaxed/simple; bh=csDUpJcvCrwb5nQUKE6rIKwnccp2Lm3sAMFjZWS0LWE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=p6B6HDfSn6Tsg4DwHCArM3u894+ywIhOD7ciLlX+LKz7OxpdWjL9zRVt5KfXsijtEgkpMfpDBfLl10ejZSbjHrbMBsI/uoHgDezVtztpcdvUuJ54Ncg3MwnVu5DC5/ENU8jnXuDVDy4GDqeF3qoJa6EGXx53OYG3kGccWAnmFuw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Zrc/fQcm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Zrc/fQcm" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0603BC072AA; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:49:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1713365341; bh=csDUpJcvCrwb5nQUKE6rIKwnccp2Lm3sAMFjZWS0LWE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Zrc/fQcmdl1DSWDPiRcKShyJ9zUpZcY3Q6TZ4j75Gpqr2n2nPHifeZ6YfEc3Z9Joo fj6m9UaqlBq2JECBILLgOuE/e5TBatqMTX/XhyLFq7EJzeBFgbslRDvg6FOLXzAZd/ qqULol9mm1N/IuYI7no3iwnOQ+gsj2vQpyC7evIu3rg+9j96BRqrG6RtHomJXM+jhz WVjz3yfl/KQfTGS/ev+sDV9c2dDROl+EjZThyziVsG7o20rdo6zI4IQAPQ2aFWjKUc PwIKi14x+3GrA5GjP1e45Bjaeob7LLvZM3Gv9qQbK6ooNi9fM2qnML3Apmn+PwWL1z R1m+P2JySSZYA== Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 07:48:59 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Pratham Patel Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Nicolas Schier , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thefirst1322@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Enable building of the devel RPM package from Kbuild Message-ID: <20240417144859.GA1471879@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> References: <20240417043654.60662-1-prathampatel@thefossguy.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240417043654.60662-1-prathampatel@thefossguy.com> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 04:37:32AM +0000, Pratham Patel wrote: > This addresses a minor nit where I want a `-devel` RPM package to be > built when I build a binary RPM package with either `binrpm-pkg` > or `rpm-pkg` target(s). > > Pratham Patel (2): > kbuild: allow toggling the `with_devel` RPM macro > docs: kbuild: document KBUILD_RPM_WITH_DEVEL > > Documentation/kbuild/kbuild.rst | 6 ++++++ > scripts/Makefile.package | 5 ++++- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > -- > 2.42.0 > Hmmm, when I execute $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 O=build mrproper defconfig binrpm-pkg I end up with $ ls -1 build/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64 kernel-6.9.0_rc4_00031_g96fca68c4fbf-1.x86_64.rpm kernel-devel-6.9.0_rc4_00031_g96fca68c4fbf-1.x86_64.rpm kernel-headers-6.9.0_rc4_00031_g96fca68c4fbf-1.x86_64.rpm so it seems like this is already happening? Cheers, Nathan