Re: [PATCH v7] rust: support for shadow call stack sanitizer

[Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3034 bytes --]

On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:08:20AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:23 AM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add all of the flags that are needed to support the shadow call stack
> > (SCS) sanitizer with Rust, and updates Kconfig to allow only
> > configurations that work.
> 
> Applied to `rust-next` -- thanks everyone!
> 
> Paul/Palmer/Albert/RISC-V: I think you were not Cc'd (at least in this
> version?), so please shout if you have a problem with this.

For some reason I deleted the series from my mailbox, must've been in
dt-binding review mode and hit ctrl + d. I've been away and busy, so my
apologies Alice for not trying this out sooner.
It's sorta annoying to test rust + scs on riscv, cos you need (unless I
am mistaken) llvm-19. llvm-18 + rust built fine, but has no SCS.

llvm-19 + rust failed to build for me riscv, producing:

In file included from /stuff/linux/rust/helpers/helpers.c:22:
/stuff/linux/rust/helpers/spinlock.c:10:23: error: call to undeclared function 'spinlock_check'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
__raw_spin_lock_init(spinlock_check(lock), name, key, LD_WAIT_CONFIG);
^
/stuff/linux/rust/helpers/spinlock.c:10:23: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion passing 'int' to parameter of type 'raw_spinlock_t *' (aka 'struct raw_spinlock *') [-Wint-conversion]
__raw_spin_lock_init(spinlock_check(lock), name, key, LD_WAIT_CONFIG);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/stuff/linux/include/linux/spinlock.h:101:52: note: passing argument to parameter 'lock' here
extern void __raw_spin_lock_init(raw_spinlock_t *lock, const char *name,
^
2 errors generated.

This occurs because I have DEBUG_SPINLOCK enabled. I didn't check why,
but Andreas seems to have introduced that code - luckily he's already on
CC here :)

With that disabled, there are dozens of warnings along the lines of:
/stuff/linux/rust/helpers/err.c:6:14: warning: symbol 'rust_helper_ERR_PTR' was not declared. Should it be static?
If those are okay for rust code, it would be rather helpful if the
warnings could be disabled - otherwise they should really be fixed.

Following that, I got a build error:

error[E0425]: cannot find function `__mutex_init` in crate `bindings`
--> /stuff/linux/rust/kernel/sync/lock/mutex.rs:104:28
|
104   |           unsafe { bindings::__mutex_init(ptr, name, key) }
|                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: a function with a similar name exists: `__mutex_rt_init`
|
::: /stuff/brsdk/work/linux/rust/bindings/bindings_generated.rs:12907:5
|
12907 | /     pub fn __mutex_rt_init(
12908 | |         lock: *mut mutex,
12909 | |         name: *const core::ffi::c_char,
12910 | |         key: *mut lock_class_key,
12911 | |     );
| |_____- similarly named function `__mutex_rt_init` defined here

error: aborting due to 1 previous error

I stopped there, Space Marine 2 awaits.

Hopefully I'll get to say hello next week,
Conor.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]