From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Rong Xu <xur@google.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>, Han Shen <shenhan@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Fix Propeller build option
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 10:46:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241108174638.GC2564051@thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241108051030.2918950-1-xur@google.com>
Hi Rong,
Thanks for the quick patch!
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 09:10:30PM -0800, Rong Xu wrote:
> The '-fbasic-block-sections=labels' option has been deprecated with
> the following llvm patch:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110039
>
> The old option still works, but with a warning like
> clang: warning: argument '-fbasic-block-sections=labels' \
> is deprecated, use '-fbasic-block-address-map' instead [-Wdeprecated]
>
> Currently, the option change is only in the ToT clang (v20) and not yet
> released in v19.
I think this whole block could be a little easier to read and understand
with some more standard kernel commit message practices. I would combine
the first and third block into one sentence and I would unwrap the
warning text (it is okay to be long for a little clarity). Perhaps
something like this?
| The '-fbasic-block-sections=labels' option has been deprecated in tip of
| tree clang (20.0.0) [1]. While the option still works, a warning is
| emitted:
|
| clang: warning: argument '-fbasic-block-sections=labels' is deprecated, use '-fbasic-block-address-map' instead [-Wdeprecated]
then putting:
| Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110039 [1]
right above your Signoff.
> This patch adds a check to the Makefile to set the proper option.
Try to avoid saying "this patch" in kernel commit messages, it is
implicit. It would be cleaner to say something like:
| Add a version check to set the proper option.
You can see some more commit message tips in sections 4.2.3 to 4.2.6 in
the tip documentation:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-tip.html#changelog
> If the option change is later integrated in v19.x, we need to update the
> check accordingly.
I think it is worth dropping this sentence entirely, as I would argue
that it is pretty unlikely that this option gets backported to
release/19.x, since it would basically accelerate the deprecation
timeline, which seems unreasonable to do in a stable release.
> Signed-off-by: Rong Xu <xur@google.com>
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> ---
> scripts/Makefile.propeller | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.propeller b/scripts/Makefile.propeller
> index 344190717e47..1a68ea0d1fe4 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.propeller
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.propeller
> @@ -5,7 +5,13 @@ ifdef CLANG_PROPELLER_PROFILE_PREFIX
> CFLAGS_PROPELLER_CLANG := -fbasic-block-sections=list=$(CLANG_PROPELLER_PROFILE_PREFIX)_cc_profile.txt -ffunction-sections
> KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --symbol-ordering-file=$(CLANG_PROPELLER_PROFILE_PREFIX)_ld_profile.txt --no-warn-symbol-ordering
> else
> - CFLAGS_PROPELLER_CLANG := -fbasic-block-sections=labels
> + # Staring with clang v20, the '-fbasic-block-sections=labels' option is
> + # deprecated. Use the recommended '-fbasic-block-address-map' option.
Might be worth linking the specific change here for archeology sake.
> + ifeq ($(call clang-min-version, 200000),y)
> + CFLAGS_PROPELLER_CLANG := -fbasic-block-address-map
> + else
> + CFLAGS_PROPELLER_CLANG := -fbasic-block-sections=labels
> + endif
> endif
>
> # Propeller requires debug information to embed module names in the profiles.
> @@ -21,7 +27,11 @@ ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN
> ifdef CLANG_PROPELLER_PROFILE_PREFIX
> KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --lto-basic-block-sections=$(CLANG_PROPELLER_PROFILE_PREFIX)_cc_profile.txt
> else
> - KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --lto-basic-block-sections=labels
> + ifeq ($(call clang-min-version, 200000),y)
Would it be better/more accurate to check the LLD version here? I doubt
it would really happen but it is possible for someone to have LLVM=1
(using their system wide ld.lld and LLVM tools) and CC=clang-20 to just
use an updated clang. Perhaps:
ifeq ($(call test-ge, $(CONFIG_LLD_VERSION), 200000),y)
here?
> + KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --lto-basic-block-address-map
> + else
> + KBUILD_LDFLAGS += --lto-basic-block-sections=labels
> + endif
> endif
> endif
>
>
> base-commit: 0dcc2d1066150787017a71f035145c566597dec7
> --
> 2.47.0.277.g8800431eea-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-08 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 5:10 [PATCH] kbuild: Fix Propeller build option Rong Xu
2024-11-08 17:46 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2024-11-08 18:49 ` Rong Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241108174638.GC2564051@thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
--cc=shenhan@google.com \
--cc=xur@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox