From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] correct disabling of -Wshift-negative-value
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 12:38:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250414193836.GA107755@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10b1ebd8-5d32-41a2-9454-1b40e98d5187@suse.com>
Hi Jan,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 04:23:36PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The warning is supported only from gcc6 onwards, hence its disabling
> needs probing that the (positive) option is actually supported.
>
> Fixes: 1344794a59db ("Kbuild: add -Wno-shift-negative-value where -Wextra is used")
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
The patch itself seems fine (I might add "scripts/Makefile.extrawarn: "
to the title) but if I understand correctly, this is only to support GCC
5? Would this be necessary if GCC 8.1 becomes the minimum supported
version of GCC for building the kernel?
https://lore.kernel.org/20250407094116.1339199-2-arnd@kernel.org/
If people are actively noticing this, perhaps we should send this to
Linus's tree for backports then Arnd could revert it in his series?
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.extrawarn
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ else
> # The following turn off the warnings enabled by -Wextra
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-missing-field-initializers
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-type-limits
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-shift-negative-value
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning,shift-negative-value)
>
> ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-enum-enum-conversion
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-14 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 14:23 [PATCH] correct disabling of -Wshift-negative-value Jan Beulich
2025-04-14 19:38 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-04-15 5:53 ` Jan Beulich
2025-04-15 21:15 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-04-16 6:07 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250414193836.GA107755@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox