From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE907483; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 00:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757032828; cv=none; b=IPMrcF3Kq1T3Xi4TSpIRNe4VcctS4Y4xfpiy3vwvuolVD3tpR1hXPDngZw3C3xbZJwX448/PnJrmafP5rMJrKHsG8brOFLE9l5lzYcLG4FDa7gK+b3kpyLuTLtUwSzcSFtK98f+rR8RrujqnYOrqGCjd3t59AjDtIfz6lkpBjIU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757032828; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+3l6yKvd05iXLIoZppQn0j3GKV53Ox+OtDsfhcT6nGY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=O/he+7VGyi2Jf1NbQKpibKtISILmZ/ZU0lDVuHaok6azlXnT3R4G6r6VDKGlaae2zNSULKt+/DKT4/RqIn7lIYIbagq7Vlf/d6zOh8v3M2dJNUADTVxDfSHzz2fFgrqgBqdwEWuAM1dK0jEHKkmBR/MihfGmoSZVNNu6jhZ3vK4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AZWTvAgE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AZWTvAgE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE906C4CEF0; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 00:40:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757032828; bh=+3l6yKvd05iXLIoZppQn0j3GKV53Ox+OtDsfhcT6nGY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AZWTvAgErao4FY1wz0MbUvxDtg+9XB/QGFLfYldri5vx/62b42/96v25vaisgnxZm nqUNmT3vaOelJ/72zzlaIV2Lt83k2hMV+5Aft6kpYvdD5Z75hA0kqEvqRWylPMwYZq SFMVdTSHt98dG4sK44fE8HvMSZ2+itk3+Z7hy55mfL3vUNhWgCxEpDhz0SIpCKjA+C DSiUFPRSxsVZHeYPBNpGPXzlIZp+EGLKQG4wWGmd+I4L5gDqUU6EKiV2a8+1AYjDgd 07mlrSfsqMHrfMBzAxO0ohHS741YkFhdE++oW4hkLjP/GpE5D5JSz5ktXnStrE2BSC u3KoM5aksrdJg== Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 17:40:27 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Vegard Nossum , Miguel Ojeda , Linus Walleij , Jeff Johnson , Randy Dunlap , David Woodhouse , "Russell King (Oracle)" , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Marco Elver , Przemek Kitszel , Ramon de C Valle , Jonathan Corbet , "Paul E. McKenney" , Nicolas Schier , Masahiro Yamada , Arnd Bergmann , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sami Tolvanen , Mark Rutland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] x86/cfi: Standardize on common "CFI:" prefix for CFI reports Message-ID: <202509041740.1A8F3A8@keescook> References: <20250904033217.it.414-kees@kernel.org> <20250904034656.3670313-4-kees@kernel.org> <20250904184004.GC2110053@ax162> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250904184004.GC2110053@ax162> On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 11:40:04AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 08:46:43PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > Use a regular "CFI:" prefix for CFI reports during alternatives setup, > > including reporting when nothing has happened (i.e. CONFIG_FINEIBT=n). > > > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > > --- > > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor > > Obviously minor but I had pointed out on v1 that there appears to be > some inconsistency within the diff around capitalization, "ignoring" vs. > "Ignoring". Oops! Sorry, I've fixed that locally now. -- Kees Cook