From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Kbuild: enable -fms-extensions
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 18:15:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251022161505.GA1226098@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251020142228.1819871-2-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 04:22:27PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Once in a while, it turns out that enabling -fms-extensions could
> allow some slightly prettier code. But every time it has come up, the
> code that had to be used instead has been deemed "not too awful" and
> not worth introducing another compiler flag for.
>
> That's probably true for each individual case, but then it's somewhat
> of a chicken/egg situation.
>
> If we just "bite the bullet" as Linus says and enable it once and for
> all, it is available whenever a use case turns up, and no individual
> case has to justify it.
>
> A lore.kernel.org search provides these examples:
>
> - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/200706301813.58435.agruen@suse.de/
> - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180419152817.GD25406@bombadil.infradead.org/
> - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/170622208395.21664.2510213291504081000@noble.neil.brown.name/
> - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87h6475w9q.fsf@prevas.dk/
> - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjeZwww6Zswn6F_iZTpUihTSNKYppLqj36iQDDhfntuEw@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Undoubtedly, there are more places in the code where this could also
> be used but where -fms-extensions just didn't come up in any
> discussion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
> ---
> Makefile | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index d14824792227..ef6f23ee8e7f 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1061,6 +1061,15 @@ NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc
> # perform bounds checking.
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fstrict-flex-arrays=3)
>
> +# Allow including a tagged struct or union anonymously in another struct/union.
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fms-extensions
> +
> +# For clang, the -fms-extensions flag is apparently not enough to
> +# express one's intention to make use of those extensions.
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-microsoft-anon-tag
> +endif
I think this should go in the first 'ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG' block in
scripts/Makefile.extrawarn below '-Wno-gnu' with a comment that is
similar in nature, which could even be combined like
# The kernel builds with '-std-gnu11' and '-fms-extensions' so the use
# of GNU and Microsoft extensions is acceptable.
Other than that, this seems fine to me.
> # disable invalid "can't wrap" optimizations for signed / pointers
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-strict-overflow
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-20 14:22 [PATCH 0/2] Kbuild: enable -fms-extensions, make btrfs the first user Rasmus Villemoes
2025-10-20 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] Kbuild: enable -fms-extensions Rasmus Villemoes
2025-10-22 16:15 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-10-22 20:35 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-10-22 21:11 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-10-23 12:40 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-10-23 14:17 ` Dave Kleikamp
2025-10-23 16:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-10-20 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: send: make use of -fms-extensions for defining struct fs_path Rasmus Villemoes
2025-10-20 19:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-10-22 5:24 ` David Sterba
2025-10-22 5:30 ` [PATCH 0/2] Kbuild: enable -fms-extensions, make btrfs the first user David Sterba
2025-10-22 16:17 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251022161505.GA1226098@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox