From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FB1F1B86C7; Sat, 1 Nov 2025 13:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762002647; cv=none; b=mWErflsGKYUlDv0g3GJOLxOTpbun+mHx5OE/lofoMk4nK6R/Hj0LHqVIQJQxm3C7JIRuIK5guHhGFJTuxD1iH9SsAphQ8b5qebfpRNkvuqPduQdL+XXNx/3jTcd0f8MZufL2WQqzuYTSL3Ct7HROck2PbD6sO9cvZ3hIhjB+pAE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762002647; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E344S8+1QRn521QovyCsMxpgRFO6Ptgyc0Tz/4QqK8M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TRcAW6y7KrIHQa1q5J0sZC1zRRciTZbNe0MDF27HN3E+9TTRjpdo4XhwNDyHwTIWdowNOMje0Cf+V3NIAKfec26oTQdH0med6VVERQwKZEqDs5krjlAivkIE686ehP0MWcJeKgzX8ueC6kcgFD8O0LJO84ULLws0gE65YcjABA8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JjT/Z/op; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JjT/Z/op" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1ED4C4CEF1; Sat, 1 Nov 2025 13:10:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762002646; bh=E344S8+1QRn521QovyCsMxpgRFO6Ptgyc0Tz/4QqK8M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JjT/Z/opVGfVr4F4Wclj1iqAhu4ykoa4Yaaxd7zIFjwL1SYIT5QzSnscf/EJdd8Rj YN8rXYZhn/6r0H0w/aXVE295papxyNTLWdwtdTcnukL+4CNroA8Y0Ppij/9Q5k7txo CIVZCKb5j2j7/QQWG11fIIsUnlyX3yOsZWN/DUEbk9PJNnX0gPCKt+imp1MezAOMax lw68wPqHGmCex+hMbsKuXecKlMl658L6dXuDjFndhJtHN+vZ8r4bKN79nLpV6Jqq78 1922RHwU1LmLYS4fDaVoU/kciVgf5qok0gA/i8KuVKD+aZg2ax6IAHq7pj5nm7ZiWD 4pjudhk5R/32w== Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 14:10:42 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Linus Torvalds , linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Rasmus Villemoes , Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba Subject: Re: fms extension (Was: [PATCH] fs/pipe: stop duplicating union pipe_index declaration) Message-ID: <20251101-bugsieren-gemocht-0e6115014a45@brauner> References: <20251029173828.GA1669504@ax162> <20251029-wobei-rezept-bd53e76bb05b@brauner> <20251030-zuruf-linken-d20795719609@brauner> <20251029233057.GA3441561@ax162> <20251030-meerjungfrau-getrocknet-7b46eacc215d@brauner> <20251030172918.GA417112@ax162> <20251030-zukunft-reduzieren-323e5f33dca6@brauner> <20251031013457.GA2650519@ax162> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251031013457.GA2650519@ax162> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 09:34:57PM -0400, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 09:16:02PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:29:18AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > There are several other places in the kernel that blow away > > > KBUILD_CFLAGS like this that will need the same fix (I went off of > > > searching for -std=gnu11, as that was needed in many places to fix GCC > > > 15). It is possible that we might want to take the opportunity to unify > > > these flags into something like KBUILD_DIALECT_CFLAGS but for now, I > > > just bothered with adding the flags in the existing places. > > > > That should hopefully do it. Can you update the shared branch with that > > and then tell me when I can repull? > > I have applied this as commit e066b73bd881 ("kbuild: Add > '-fms-extensions' to areas with dedicated CFLAGS") in the > kbuild-ms-extensions branch. I may solicit acks from architecture > maintainers but I would like to make sure there are no other surprises > before then. I'd like a stable branch before -rc5, please.