From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: david.laight.linux@gmail.com
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kbuild: Only enable -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare for W=2
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 13:12:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251219201231.GB1404453@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251214131528.3648-1-david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Hi David,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 01:15:28PM +0000, david.laight.linux@gmail.com wrote:
> From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
>
> The kernel code style is to use !(expr) rather that (expr) == 0.
> But clang complains that converting some constant expressions
> (eg (0xffffu << 16)) to a boolean always evalutes to true.
> This happens often in the validity checks in #defines.
> Move tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare to W=2 (along with the
> similar type-limits).
>
> Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
I would like Arnd to comment on this before applying because the
reasoning of this change does not feel good enough to disable this
warning. It is not like '== 0' is inherently uncommon in the kernel or
hard to write to avoid the implicit conversion warning. To be honest, I
am a bit surprised -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare fires
for that instead of some sort of -Wconversion warning...
> ---
> scripts/Makefile.warn | 2 +-I
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.warn b/scripts/Makefile.warn
> index 68e6fafcb80c..e2d467835c5b 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.warn
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.warn
> @@ -151,7 +151,6 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wformat-insufficient-args
> endif
> endif
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -Wno-pointer-to-enum-cast)
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -Wno-unaligned-access)
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-enum-compare-conditional
> endif
> @@ -179,6 +178,7 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-shift-negative-value
>
> ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-enum-enum-conversion
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-tautological-constant-out-of-range-compare
> endif
>
> ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC
> --
> 2.39.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-19 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-14 13:15 [PATCH 1/1] kbuild: Only enable -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare for W=2 david.laight.linux
2025-12-19 20:12 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-12-19 20:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-12-19 22:18 ` David Laight
2025-12-20 10:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-12-20 12:15 ` David Laight
2025-12-22 10:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-12-22 17:14 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251219201231.GB1404453@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox