From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D4B12741B6; Sat, 13 Jun 2026 16:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781369864; cv=none; b=eoPO54xlcP/VPCvaV9o4iPhZ6dej2Wtnww12SbOM7NO1odnA+HWB5IuRGWKMs4Eu7JTIuNm7e8TsxPB/n4tV9NjYYRqSQDWxMqwmRxOQwHa3Uq8BU9lOtCpmwsrDNIbAFSjcwlTA9v5/Yu6IFC8h+HpUV1wyp75FiyZVFkEU8tk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781369864; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gBl6HYf2cYjTVKCP6gyydKpLvyLum+plGHiCXwPUrxQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZFnyTu1xkkZbxQ8bNDkYbUt4A2xXYWgHdpVdlBRbxybJxUevlQTtm9YPmdvYISq6F212Z0wWg5pKZMyACAmH4zZK36kQaG/DbptOeH7+ahfSO1Z8bVJAhOdOlgulZFQvcl4pX00ZSONr70W3PA/NuDxkEsYh9z3tuHXqdE0WJRg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=F244cEWm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="F244cEWm" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FC1A1F000E9; Sat, 13 Jun 2026 16:57:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781369862; bh=35IHbTu3tEKf360Pfg5kvbRcvSef/I2tzHiMDnwImus=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=F244cEWmHnbJibbpiKRprqc6qHovylKhChnoyg4aofPNwbGTnM1haO2LY6NXOpyuN 8CTBMDShd4n3g1JV9phkkK21tJ7HzEwSQ5rmm3rgH97eWphy8KSEgLdBCcs1GuzDFk Kl4dthrklx3MvAN7Zne0uBiqDoKxzcxdhh0yHFhMu1hYWifobF1Lorx8X6F7oUjhlO MhTeEYvghJOA49XDzksMbxRHdW0fFBTs1RCbrSu0CqJSp3s/AlIIP6XdTRQrpVsGK+ jrphqAuz+sz8LywVc/Lv2We1GWQ+QORKn0MEsnntsVQpKyhbZhg24FrfN0EZ8UlxWY VSYFlXYe1AdTQ== Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:57:38 -0400 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Nicolas Schier Cc: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= , Arnd Bergmann , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Nick Huang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: headers_install.sh: Normalize __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ Message-ID: <20260613165738.GA3152432@ax162> References: <20260309-uapi-assembly-v1-1-a7ebfbf14309@weissschuh.net> <20260313235618.GA4171564@ax162> <3d6608fe-be15-497a-85a3-e6af2dbded0a@t-8ch.de> <20260324183501.GA3704429@ax162> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Sat, Jun 13, 2026 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Nicolas Schier wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 08:58:08PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > On 2026-03-24 11:35:01-0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 06:05:34PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > > On 2026-03-13 16:56:18-0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > > It sounds like the "< GCC 3.0" part of that might not be true based on > > > > > Maciej's research? > > > > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/alpine.DEB.2.21.2603101412520.63708@angie.orcam.me.uk/ > > > > > > > > Yes, indeed. In my opinion the consistency aspect is still sufficient > > > > to have this change. What do you think? > > > > > > Yes, I think so. Will you keep it as going from __ASSEMBLY__ to > > > __ASSEMBLER__? It probably makes more sense that way given there should > > > be no regressions on the compiler side and that is the intended end > > > result? > > > > I would have stuck to the old name '__ASSEMBLY__', just for robustness > > and because we are late in the cycle. > > Then we can switch it early in the next cycle. > > What's the state with this? Shall this show up in linux-next early this > cycle? This fell off my radar. I think the commit message needs some small updates based on my review upthread but once resent, we should be able to take it when 7.2-rc1 is out? -- Cheers, Nathan