From: Tor Vic <torvic9@mailbox.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: Add CONFIG_KERNEL_UNCOMPRESSED support
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:19:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39417993-9fec-4ff0-aac2-6bb2c5a96b3b@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez2hVHk-C4XAGW2GieHZ9JAF0RrFfpZF7XhYc80pznMwbA@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/22/25 14:54, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:31 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
>> Hi Jann,
>>
>> On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 23:16, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Support storing the kernel uncompressed for developers who want to quickly
>>> iterate with one-off kernel builds.
>>> Store it in the usual format with a 4-byte length suffix and keep this new
>>> codepath as close as possible to the normal path where decompression
>>> happens.
>>>
>>> The other compression methods offered by the kernel take some time;
>>> even LZ4 (which the kernel uses at compression level 9) takes ~2.8
>>> seconds to compress a 110M large vmlinux.bin on my machine.
>>>
>>> An alternate approach to this would be to offer customization of the LZ4
>>> compression level through a kconfig variable; and yet another approach
>>> would be to abuse the existing gzip decompression logic by storing the
>>> kernel as "non-compressed" DEFLATE blocks, so that the decompression code
>>> will essentially end up just doing a bunch of memcpy() calls.
>>>
>>
>> This all seems pretty complicated, and adding yet another
>> (pseudo-)compression method is not great in terms of maintenance
>> burden, especially because there are other consumers of the compressed
>> images (both for bzImage and EFI zboot)
>>
>> Did you try running gzip with -1 instead of -9? On my build machine,
>> this reduces the compression time of a defconfig bzImage build from
>> 4.3 seconds to 0.9 seconds.
>
> I tried lz4 with -1; that is very fast (240ms wall clock time on my
> machine, and just 120ms user time):
>
> $ ls -lh arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin
> -rwxr-x--- 1 [...] 110M Jan 22 00:01 arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin
> $ cat arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin | time lz4 -l -9 - - | wc -c
> 2.86user 0.04system 0:02.96elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 15756maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (0major+220minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> 46309676
> $ cat arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin | time lz4 -l -1 - - | wc -c
> 0.12user 0.06system 0:00.24elapsed 75%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 15524maxresident)k
> 0inputs+0outputs (0major+94minor)pagefaults 0swaps
> 56029608
>
> But I wasn't sure how to wire that up in a nice way. I guess the
> nicest option would be to create a separate kconfig variable for the
> compression level to use for any cmd_lz4/cmd_lz4_with_size invocations
> in the build process; and then maybe only make this option visible if
> LZ4 is selected as kernel compression method?
>
> Another option would be to create a new option in the "Kernel
> compression mode" choice menu with a name like "LZ4 (fast)", turn
> CONFIG_KERNEL_LZ4 into an internal flag that is selected by both LZ4
> variants shown in the choice menu, and duplicate some of the make
> rules, but that seems overly complicated.
>
Hello,
In my opinion 'lz4 -9' doesn't make much sense.
It's terribly slow and the compression ratio is also not exactly good.
Instead, zstd seems to be a much better choice. Not quite as ultra fast
as lz4 levels 1 to 3, but much better compression.
As an example, I compressed a kernel source tarball (zstd is
multithreaded with 4 threads here, which are not fully used with
small-ish files like vmlinux):
- zstd -3: from 1.32 GB to 199 MB in 5.23 seconds
- zstd -6: to 173 MB in 10.77 seconds
- zstd -10: to 165 MB in 24.52 seconds
- lz4 -1: to 373 MB in 1.60 seconds
- lz4 -3: to 278 MB in 6.45 seconds
- lz4 -9: to 266 MB in 22.03 seconds
And a vmlinux from my installed kernel 6.13:
- zstd -3: from 51.8 MB to 16.7 MB in 0.60 seconds
- zstd -6: to 15.8 MB in 1.39 seconds
- zstd -10: to 15.3 MB in 3.54 seconds
- lz4 -1: to 23.7 MB in 0.08 seconds
- lz4 -3: to 20.2 MB in 0.51 seconds
- lz4 -9: to 19.7 MB in 1.23 seconds
For my kernel, I use a Kconfig option to choose a zstd compression
level. I could submit it if there is interest.
Tor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-22 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-21 22:16 [PATCH RFC] x86: Add CONFIG_KERNEL_UNCOMPRESSED support Jann Horn
2025-01-22 13:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-01-22 13:54 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-22 14:19 ` Tor Vic [this message]
2025-01-22 14:30 ` Jann Horn
2025-01-22 14:52 ` Tor Vic
2025-01-22 14:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-02-23 18:33 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39417993-9fec-4ff0-aac2-6bb2c5a96b3b@mailbox.org \
--to=torvic9@mailbox.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox