From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:60655 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760965AbYEXU5U (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2008 16:57:20 -0400 Message-ID: <48388112.6030003@goop.org> Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 21:56:50 +0100 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG_* symbols for .c files References: <20080524192540.GA28067@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080524125316.4b969936.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <48387736.9050004@goop.org> <20080524204610.GB3136@uranus.ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20080524204610.GB3136@uranus.ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kbuild , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Roman Zippel Sam Ravnborg wrote: > When we have one configuration for the kernel and not as today > where we have one configuration for each architecture (with a lot > of shared files) then it is already taken care of by my (updated) patch. Yep. But is a unified config something that someone is actively working on, or a distant pipe dream? J