From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:50098 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933652AbcLBOwb (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:52:31 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH, v3.9] default exported asm symbols to zero Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 15:51:22 +0100 Message-ID: <49974235.a4bETaqHmt@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: References: <20161129131922.GA31466@angband.pl> <8452191.39CeLIHTBT@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linus Torvalds , Adam Borowski , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Michal Marek , Ben Hutchings , Debian kernel maintainers , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , Nicholas Piggin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alan Modra On Friday, December 2, 2016 1:59:15 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > With binutils-2.16 and before, a weak missing symbol was kept during the > > 2.26? > > > final link, and a missing CRC for an export would lead to that CRC > > being treated as zero implicitly. With binutils-2.17, the crc > > 2.27?' Yes, serious version number deficiency on my end. Also 4.9 instead of 3.9 in the subject... Arnd