Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Steppeing down as Maintainer

[Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>]

Sam Ravnborg napsal(a):
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 05:21:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Sam,
>>
>> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:26:13 +0100 Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>>> It has been fun but the last year or more it has
>>> been a duty and a burden. So I leave it open for
>>> other to take over.
>> I, also, want to thank you very much for all your work.
>>
>> I am, however, wondering what will happen to the changes you have that are
>> currently in linux-next:
>>
>> Apparently for v2.6.32 (in kbuild-current):
>>
>> Michael Tokarev (1):
>>       kbuild: fix bzImage build for x86
>>
>> And queued for v2.6.33:
>>
>> Sam Ravnborg (14):
>>       kbuild: search arch/$ARCH/include before include/
>>       dontdiff: add generated
>>       kbuild: move bounds.h to include/generated
>>       kbuild: move asm-offsets.h to include/generated
>>       ia64: move nr-irqs.h to include/generated
>>       arm: move mach-types to include/generated
>>       sh: move machtypes.h to include/generated
>>       kbuild: drop include2/ used for O=... builds
>>       kbuild: do not check for include/asm-$ARCH
>>       kbuild: drop include/asm
>>       kbuild: move compile.h to include/generated
>>       drop explicit include of autoconf.h
>>       kbuild: move autoconf.h to include/generated
>>       kbuild: move utsrelease.h to include/generated
>>
>> I am (for the moment) still merging these from the copy I have of your
>> trees, but what to do in the longer term?
> 
> I will submit the patches like any other regular submitter to linux-kbuild
> if the upcoming Maintainers does not pick them up from the git trees.

I took your kbuild-next.git and I'm going through the other patches
posted to linux-kbuild recently. I'll push the repo once passes some
testing.

Michal