From: Piotr Hosowicz <piotr@hosowicz.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Maybe my frequent kernel building could be of some help to the community? And how to build?
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:42:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA765B8.5010808@example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BA6E87D.2030405@xenotime.net>
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/21/10 20:31, Piotr Hosowicz wrote:
>> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> One thing that you could do that no one focuses on is building
>>> with some kconfig symbols disabled (ones that are typically enabled),
>>> such as CONFIG_SMP=n, CONFIG_SYSFS=n, CONFIG_PROC_FS=n, CONFIG_PM=n,
>>> CONFIG_PCI=n, CONFIG_BLOCK=n, CONFIG_NET=n, CONFIG_INET=n (but latter
>>> with CONFIG_NET=y), CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n. Not all of these at the same time,
>>> just various/random combinations of them.
>> I am glad I can help. At last I sat down to write the scripts, I was so
>> excited I couldn't fall asleep ;-). I figured it out in such a way:
>>
>> - separate system user for building
>> - in his crontab everyminute a build try starts with randomized options
>> you mentioned - this works, I hope
>>
>> The problem is that it requires my assistance, because it asks a few
>> questions like in make oldconfig when there are new options available. I
>> do not know how to fix this.
>>
>> Here are the scripts:
>>
>> # randomize-conf.sh
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>>
>> NETENABLED=0
>> function enable_or_not(){
>> if test $RANDOM -lt 16383 ; then
>> if test $1=CONFIG_NET ; then
>> NETENABLED=1
>> echo $1=y
>> return
>> fi
>> if test $1=CONFIG_INET && test $NETENABLED -eq 1 ; then
>> if test $RANDOM -lt 16383 ; then
>> echo $1=y
>> else
>> echo '# CONFIG_'$1' is not set'
>> fi
>> return
>> fi
>> else
>> echo '# CONFIG_'$1' is not set'
>> fi
>> }
>>
>> while read LINE ; do
>> FIRST=$(echo $LINE | cut -d '=' -f 1)
>> case $FIRST in
>> CONFIG_SMP)
>> enable_or_not CONFIG_SMP
>> ;;
>> CONFIG_SYSFS)
>> enable_or_not CONFIG_SYSFS
>> ;;
>> CONFIG_PROC_FS)
>> enable_or_not CONFIG_PROC_FS
>> ;;
>> CONFIG_PM)
>> enable_or_not CONFIG_PM
>> ;;
>> CONFIG_PCI)
>> enable_or_not CONFIG_PCI
>> ;;
>> CONFIG_BLOCK)
>> enable_or_not CONFIG_BLOCK
>> ;;
>> CONFIG_NET)
>> enable_or_not CONFIG_NET
>> ;;
>> CONFIG_INET)
>> enable_or_not CONFIG_INET
>> ;;
>> CONFIG_HOTPLUG)
>> enable_or_not CONFIG_HOTPLUG
>> ;;
>> *)
>> echo $LINE
>> esac
>> done
>>
>> # try-build.sh
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>>
>> RCPT=phz@localhost
>>
>> function tidy(){
>> rm ../results/.config 2>/dev/null
>> rm ../results/build.log 2>/dev/null
>> rm ../BUILDING-NOW 2>/dev/null
>> }
>>
>> cd ~/kernel/linux
>> if test -f ../BUILDING-NOW ; then
>> exit 0
>> else
>> touch ../BUILDING-NOW
>> make mrproper
>> cat ../config.all | ../randomize-conf.sh > ./.config
>> make prepare
>
> Hm, I'm not even familiar with "make prepare". Instead at this point I use
> "make oldconfig", and to help it along with answers (non-interactive answers,
> that is), use 'yes', like:
>
> yes '' | make oldconfig
>
> I think that this will fix what you described...
No, it will not. The problem is somewhere in my randomizer. During build
preparation it oldconfig-style asks eg for SMP which is enabled in the
template. It should not ask. Now I observe that it functions randomly.
Sometimes build procedes as expected, sometimes not. I must carefully
think it through, possibly rewrite.
--
Z cyklu "Uroki demokracji", czyli pytania i odpowiedzi w teledurniejach:
- W którym kraju znajduje się Mount Everest?
- Hm, to nie Szkocja, prawda?
NP: Mark Knopfler - Piper To The End
NB: 2.6.34-rc1-git9-a
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-22 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-16 19:02 Maybe my frequent kernel building could be of some help to the community? And how to build? Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-16 19:24 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-16 19:33 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-16 19:42 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-17 3:24 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-17 15:07 ` Randy Dunlap
[not found] ` <4BA0F8DE.1050006@example.com>
2010-03-17 15:54 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-17 16:03 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-17 17:49 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-17 17:53 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-18 15:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-22 3:31 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-22 3:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-22 12:42 ` Piotr Hosowicz [this message]
2010-03-22 12:53 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-24 1:12 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-24 21:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-25 11:38 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-25 17:29 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-25 17:37 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-25 17:40 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-25 17:48 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-25 17:54 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-25 18:35 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-25 22:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-25 22:15 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-26 16:46 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-27 16:37 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-27 16:39 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-04-01 16:02 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-04-01 17:24 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-04-01 17:44 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 20:16 ` Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something? Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 20:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-29 20:41 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 21:33 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-29 22:32 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 22:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-29 22:44 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 22:48 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-29 22:55 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 23:06 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-29 23:44 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-30 16:37 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-30 18:03 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-30 19:00 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-31 9:15 ` Piotr Hosowicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA765B8.5010808@example.com \
--to=piotr@hosowicz.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).