linux-kbuild.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Piotr Hosowicz <piotr@hosowicz.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Maybe my frequent kernel building could be of some help to the community? And how to build?
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:42:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA765B8.5010808@example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BA6E87D.2030405@xenotime.net>

Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/21/10 20:31, Piotr Hosowicz wrote:
>> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> One thing that you could do that no one focuses on is building
>>> with some kconfig symbols disabled (ones that are typically enabled),
>>> such as CONFIG_SMP=n, CONFIG_SYSFS=n, CONFIG_PROC_FS=n, CONFIG_PM=n,
>>> CONFIG_PCI=n, CONFIG_BLOCK=n, CONFIG_NET=n, CONFIG_INET=n (but latter
>>> with CONFIG_NET=y), CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n.  Not all of these at the same time,
>>> just various/random combinations of them.
>> I am glad I can help. At last I sat down to write the scripts, I was so
>> excited I couldn't fall asleep ;-). I figured it out in such a way:
>>
>> - separate system user for building
>> - in his crontab everyminute a build try starts with randomized options
>> you mentioned - this works, I hope
>>
>> The problem is that it requires my assistance, because it asks a few
>> questions like in make oldconfig when there are new options available. I
>> do not know how to fix this.
>>
>> Here are the scripts:
>>
>> # randomize-conf.sh
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>>
>> NETENABLED=0
>> function enable_or_not(){
>>   if test $RANDOM -lt 16383 ; then
>>     if test $1=CONFIG_NET ; then
>>       NETENABLED=1
>>       echo $1=y
>>       return
>>     fi
>>     if test $1=CONFIG_INET && test $NETENABLED -eq 1 ; then
>>       if test $RANDOM -lt 16383 ; then
>>         echo $1=y
>>       else
>>         echo '# CONFIG_'$1' is not set'
>>       fi
>>       return
>>     fi
>>   else
>>     echo '# CONFIG_'$1' is not set'
>>   fi
>> }
>>
>> while read LINE ; do
>>   FIRST=$(echo $LINE | cut -d '=' -f 1)
>>   case $FIRST in
>>     CONFIG_SMP)
>>       enable_or_not CONFIG_SMP
>>     ;;
>>     CONFIG_SYSFS)
>>       enable_or_not CONFIG_SYSFS
>>     ;;
>>     CONFIG_PROC_FS)
>>       enable_or_not CONFIG_PROC_FS
>>     ;;
>>     CONFIG_PM)
>>       enable_or_not CONFIG_PM
>>     ;;
>>     CONFIG_PCI)
>>       enable_or_not CONFIG_PCI
>>     ;;
>>     CONFIG_BLOCK)
>>       enable_or_not CONFIG_BLOCK
>>     ;;
>>     CONFIG_NET)
>>       enable_or_not CONFIG_NET
>>     ;;
>>     CONFIG_INET)
>>       enable_or_not CONFIG_INET
>>     ;;
>>     CONFIG_HOTPLUG)
>>       enable_or_not CONFIG_HOTPLUG
>>     ;;
>>     *)
>>       echo $LINE
>>   esac
>> done
>>
>> # try-build.sh
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>>
>> RCPT=phz@localhost
>>
>> function tidy(){
>>   rm ../results/.config 2>/dev/null
>>   rm ../results/build.log 2>/dev/null
>>   rm ../BUILDING-NOW 2>/dev/null
>> }
>>
>> cd ~/kernel/linux
>> if test -f ../BUILDING-NOW ; then
>>   exit 0
>> else
>>   touch ../BUILDING-NOW
>>   make mrproper
>>   cat ../config.all | ../randomize-conf.sh > ./.config
>>   make prepare
> 
> Hm, I'm not even familiar with "make prepare".  Instead at this point I use
> "make oldconfig", and to help it along with answers (non-interactive answers,
> that is), use 'yes', like:
> 
>     yes '' | make oldconfig
> 
> I think that this will fix what you described...

No, it will not. The problem is somewhere in my randomizer. During build 
preparation it oldconfig-style asks eg for SMP which is enabled in the 
template. It should not ask. Now I observe that it functions randomly. 
Sometimes build procedes as expected, sometimes not. I must carefully 
think it through, possibly rewrite.

-- 
Z cyklu "Uroki demokracji", czyli pytania i odpowiedzi w teledurniejach:
- W którym kraju znajduje się Mount Everest?
- Hm, to nie Szkocja, prawda?
NP: Mark Knopfler - Piper To The End
NB: 2.6.34-rc1-git9-a

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-22 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-16 19:02 Maybe my frequent kernel building could be of some help to the community? And how to build? Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-16 19:24 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-16 19:33   ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-16 19:42     ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-17  3:24   ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-17 15:07     ` Randy Dunlap
     [not found]       ` <4BA0F8DE.1050006@example.com>
2010-03-17 15:54         ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-17 16:03           ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-17 17:49           ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-17 17:53             ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-18 15:40   ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-22  3:31     ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-22  3:48       ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-22 12:42         ` Piotr Hosowicz [this message]
2010-03-22 12:53           ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-24  1:12             ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-24 21:43               ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-25 11:38                 ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-25 17:29     ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-25 17:37       ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-25 17:40         ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-25 17:48           ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-25 17:54             ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-25 18:35               ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-25 22:04                 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-25 22:15                   ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-26 16:46                     ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-27 16:37                       ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-27 16:39                         ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-04-01 16:02       ` Randy Dunlap
2010-04-01 17:24         ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-04-01 17:44           ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 20:16   ` Is root kernel parameter expected to be the first one or something? Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 20:38     ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-29 20:41       ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 21:33         ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-29 22:32           ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 22:39             ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-29 22:44               ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 22:48                 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-29 22:55                   ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-29 23:06                     ` Randy Dunlap
2010-03-29 23:44                       ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-30 16:37                   ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-30 18:03                     ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-30 19:00                       ` Piotr Hosowicz
2010-03-31  9:15                         ` Piotr Hosowicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BA765B8.5010808@example.com \
    --to=piotr@hosowicz.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).