public inbox for linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
To: Hiromu Yakura <hiromu1996@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	zippel@linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: add warning about permission of config file
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:01:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DDBC846.8050402@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306247192.7501.25.camel@hiromu-MacBook>

On 24.5.2011 16:26, Hiromu Yakura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2011 at 22:23, Michal Marek<mmarek@suse.cz>  wrote:
>> Arnaud's point is that your patch should not be necessary at all,
>> because kconfig already checks the return value of the fopen() call in
>> conf_write() and prints the above message if it fails. So do you have a
>> testcase where make<...>config without your patch returns without
>> error, but the configuration is not written?
> Sorry for misunderstanding.
> Indeed, make *config which use 'conf' (e.g. oldconfig, defconfig...)
> raise error.
> And only xconfig and gconfig don't write the configuration without
> error.

I see, qconf lacks a check for the return value of conf_write() in 
ConfigMainWindow::closeEvent(), gconf does check the return value, but 
only displays it in the bottom box of the main window instead of a 
message box. Neither of them return failure in the error case. These 
bugs should be indeed fixed. But I don't like the directory permission 
check, it only handles one case, but does not handle permission on the 
.config file itself with KCONFIG_OVERWRITECONFIG=1, ENOSPC and so on.

Michal

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-24 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1306167401.18840.8.camel@hiromu-MacBook>
     [not found] ` <BANLkTikhFdd_PRzCg3w9HD1TO=cmdmm6_A@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-24 13:06   ` [PATCH] Kconfig: add warning about permission of config file Hiromu Yakura
2011-05-24 13:23     ` Michal Marek
2011-05-24 14:26       ` Hiromu Yakura
2011-05-24 15:01         ` Michal Marek [this message]
2011-05-24 15:50           ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-05-24 16:49             ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-05-24 17:38             ` Hiromu Yakura
2011-05-24 17:59               ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-05-24 20:46                 ` Hiromu Yakura
2011-05-24 21:49                   ` Arnaud Lacombe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DDBC846.8050402@suse.cz \
    --to=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=hiromu1996@gmail.com \
    --cc=lacombar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox