From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41500 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755632Ab1EYUhZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 16:37:25 -0400 Message-ID: <4DDD68C3.7000004@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:38:27 +0200 From: Michal Marek MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/34] isdn/diva: Drop __TIME__ usage References: <1302015561-21047-1-git-send-email-mmarek@suse.cz> <1302015561-21047-13-git-send-email-mmarek@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Armin Schindler Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Dne 5.4.2011 17:10, Armin Schindler napsal(a): > On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michal Marek wrote: >> The kernel already prints its build timestamp during boot, no need to >> repeat it in random drivers and produce different object files each >> time. > > The module can be build separately from the kernel, therefore it can have > an own build timestamp. So the module timestamp and kernel timestamp vary by a couple of minutes. But is it really a problem? I don't think so. So is there an objection against applying this patch? thanks, Michal