Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Introduce KCONFIG(), KCONFIG_BUILTIN() and KCONFIG_MODULE()

Michal Marek
2011-07-27T08:37:00Z

On 27.7.2011 06:35, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:42:04 -0400 Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe<lacombar@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:
>>>> I guess I prefer your ENABLED() syntax then.
>>>>
>>> we need to be careful about namespace pollution/collision.
>>>
>> For the sake of having numbers:
>>
>> % git grep -w ENABLED . | wc -l
>> 116
>> % git grep -w CONFIGURED . | wc -l
>> 11
>> % git grep -w KCONFIG . | wc -l
>> 1
>
> OK. Then I would go back to a predicate like the original patch had,
> e.g.:
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)

Good idea. Is anyone against
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO)
IS_ENABLED_BUILTIN(CONFIG_FOO)
IS_ENABLED_MODULE(CONFIG_FOO)
?

Michal