From: Emmanuel Deloget <emmanuel.deloget@efixo.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Enable 'make CONFIG_FOO=y oldconfig'
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:00:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E42B940.6070904@efixo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312993987.2989.53.camel@i7.infradead.org>
On 08/10/2011 06:33 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 10:34 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> your point being ? I might as well tell you that I find the current
>> behavior of 'all*.config' just as broken wrt. to dependency
>> management.
> You might indeed. And I would find that commentary just as irrelevant
> and unhelpful.
>
>>> If you have nothing relevant to say, just don't say anything.
>>>
>> maybe you can come with a detailed description of your proposal's
>> behavior, including how to manage case like this, instead of just
>> throwing patch around ?
> How's this for a definition:
>
> "The behaviour for unsettable (or unclearable) options shall be exactly
> like it already is if you put them in all*.config, or if you manually
> edit the .config file and run 'make oldconfig', as people have been
> doing for years. There is nothing new to see here."
>
>> If I do:
>>
>> # make CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT=y allnoconfig
>>
>> I expect either a success or an error, not a silent discard. And
>> *yes*, the problem already exists with "all*.config".
> [dwmw2@i7 linux-2.6]$ make CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT=y allnoconfig
> scripts/kconfig/conf --allnoconfig Kconfig
> #
> # Could not set CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT=y; perhaps it has unmet dependencies?
> #
> #
> # configuration written to .config
> #
>
I understand that my question is indeed neither wanted nor clever, but
what's the point of trying to support "make CONFIG_FOO=y"?
Will we be expected to type a 42 meters long command line to compile the
kernel instead of doing a menuconfig in the foreseable future? (and
between typos, unmet dependencies and the myriad of other possible
errors, I'm not sure I'll get more free time).
I don't get it. If the goal is to help the kernel hackers and if it
really helps them it might be a thing to do - it might prove useful for
very simple CONFIG_ options but I'm not sure this will stay true for the
general case.
Best regards,
-- Emmanuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-10 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1312067499.22074.59.camel@i7.infradead.org>
2011-07-30 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Factor out conf_validate_choice_val() function from conf_read_simple() David Woodhouse
2011-07-31 2:17 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31 22:21 ` David Woodhouse
2011-07-30 23:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Enable 'make CONFIG_FOO=y oldconfig' David Woodhouse
2011-07-30 23:44 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-30 23:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-31 0:05 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31 0:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-31 1:06 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31 1:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-31 2:09 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31 5:21 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31 22:18 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-09 15:22 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31 7:33 ` David Woodhouse
2011-07-31 16:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-07-31 16:57 ` David Woodhouse
2011-07-31 17:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-07-31 17:40 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-09 14:14 ` Michal Marek
2011-08-09 15:26 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 12:59 ` Michal Marek
2011-08-10 13:07 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 14:15 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 14:17 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 14:34 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 16:33 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 17:00 ` Emmanuel Deloget [this message]
2011-08-10 17:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-10 17:44 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 17:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-10 17:59 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 18:40 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 18:52 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 22:33 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 23:16 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 3:29 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-11 8:42 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 8:58 ` Michal Marek
2011-08-11 11:10 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 11:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-08-11 11:40 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 11:56 ` Michal Marek
2011-08-11 13:20 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 14:57 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-11 15:07 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 15:24 ` Michal Marek
2011-08-11 15:50 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 17:01 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-08-10 17:25 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E42B940.6070904@efixo.com \
--to=emmanuel.deloget@efixo.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lacombar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox