public inbox for linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: emmanuel.deloget@efixo.com
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Enable 'make CONFIG_FOO=y oldconfig'
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:52:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E42C575.1040408@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E42B940.6070904@efixo.com>

On 08/10/2011 12:00 PM, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> 
> I understand that my question is indeed neither wanted nor clever, but 
> what's the point of trying to support "make CONFIG_FOO=y"?
> 
> Will we be expected to type a 42 meters long command line to compile the 
> kernel instead of doing a menuconfig in the foreseable future? (and 
> between typos, unmet dependencies and the myriad of other possible 
> errors, I'm not sure I'll get more free time).
> 
> I don't get it. If the goal is to help the kernel hackers and if it 
> really helps them it might be a thing to do - it might prove useful for 
> very simple CONFIG_ options but I'm not sure this will stay true for the 
> general case.
> 

That's useful for some cases, though, instead of having to create a
file; the driving cases here are architecture, platform or 32/64-bit
selection.  For longer ones you'll create a file.

And no, menuconfig and .config files will not go away.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-10 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1312067499.22074.59.camel@i7.infradead.org>
2011-07-30 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Factor out conf_validate_choice_val() function from conf_read_simple() David Woodhouse
2011-07-31  2:17   ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31 22:21     ` David Woodhouse
2011-07-30 23:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] Enable 'make CONFIG_FOO=y oldconfig' David Woodhouse
2011-07-30 23:44   ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-30 23:53     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-31  0:05       ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31  0:29         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-31  1:06           ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31  1:28             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-31  2:09               ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31  5:21                 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31 22:18                 ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-09 15:22                   ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-31  7:33             ` David Woodhouse
2011-07-31 16:37               ` Randy Dunlap
2011-07-31 16:57                 ` David Woodhouse
2011-07-31 17:08                   ` Randy Dunlap
2011-07-31 17:40                     ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-09 14:14         ` Michal Marek
2011-08-09 15:26           ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 12:59             ` Michal Marek
2011-08-10 13:07               ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 14:15                 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 14:17                   ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 14:34                     ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 16:33                       ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 17:00                         ` Emmanuel Deloget
2011-08-10 17:52                           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-08-10 17:44                         ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 17:54                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-10 17:59                           ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 18:40                             ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 18:52                               ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 22:33                                 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-10 23:16                                   ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11  3:29                                     ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-11  8:42                                       ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11  8:58                                         ` Michal Marek
2011-08-11 11:10                                           ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 11:15                                             ` Andreas Schwab
2011-08-11 11:40                                               ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 11:56                                                 ` Michal Marek
2011-08-11 13:20                                                   ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 14:57                                                   ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-08-11 15:07                                                     ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-11 15:24                                                       ` Michal Marek
2011-08-11 15:50                                                         ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-10 17:01                   ` Randy Dunlap
2011-08-10 17:25                     ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E42C575.1040408@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=emmanuel.deloget@efixo.com \
    --cc=lacombar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox