From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:41288 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756300Ab2BGU0f (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:26:35 -0500 Message-ID: <4F3188E9.8000804@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:26:17 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Kconfig and toolchain dependencies References: <4F2C51A5.1040800@zytor.com> <20120204183259.GA28208@leaf> In-Reply-To: <20120204183259.GA28208@leaf> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Josh Triplett Cc: "linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar On 02/04/2012 10:32 AM, Josh Triplett wrote: >> >> Does anyone have a feel for if this would be a good addition, and if so >> where it best fits into the chain? > > This seems like a *great* idea. Unfortunately, a quick look at the > implementation of kbuild suggests that it doesn't currently implement > numeric comparisons (<, <=, >, >=), only equality (= and !=). Most of > the time, a Kconfig file will want to write "depends GCC >= > some_version". > > Looking at scripts/kconfig/expr.c, it doesn't look that hard to add, > though. > Range dependencies are probably useful in their own right, too. -hpa