From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out.selfhost.de ([82.98.82.95]:41884 "EHLO outgoing.selfhost.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750853Ab2FGEHf (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2012 00:07:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD02902.6040402@afaics.de> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 06:07:30 +0200 From: Harald Dunkel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/package/builddeb: include generated header files References: <4FC0F29C.9050508@afaics.de> <20120526210005.GB32523@sepie.suse.cz> <4FC15323.1070206@afaics.de> In-Reply-To: <4FC15323.1070206@afaics.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Michal Marek Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/27/12 00:03, Harald Dunkel wrote: > On 05/26/12 23:00, Michal Marek wrote: >> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 05:11:24PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: >>> Below is a patch. > : > >> Thanks. There was already a patch fixing this by someone else: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-kbuild/msg06313.html, so I applied that one. > > > Thats fine with me. Peter's patch looks almost the same. > Question: Do we really have to include all the .syscalls_32.h.cmd .unistd_32.h.cmd .unistd_64.h.cmd files in the linux-headers package? These files don't look like C code. If not, then I would still recommend my patch instead. Regards Harri -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/QKPgACgkQUTlbRTxpHjci+gCfc3vQsfziOFZiDIj+1mgjGvEk tXEAmwUWGfo2B2OO500gz+vzRUpEAzwe =2s5i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----