From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18140 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751468Ab3GHNcQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:32:16 -0400 Message-ID: <51DABF5C.3080502@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09:32:12 -0400 From: Doug Ledford MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kbuild: add generation of kernel-devel References: <20130624143658.10761.3787.stgit@phlsvslse11.ph.intel.com> <20130624143833.10761.94871.stgit@phlsvslse11.ph.intel.com> <51D5919B.7010208@suse.cz> <32E1700B9017364D9B60AED9960492BC2115DC69@FMSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> <51DAACB9.5080103@suse.cz> <32E1700B9017364D9B60AED9960492BC2115DD48@FMSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <32E1700B9017364D9B60AED9960492BC2115DD48@FMSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Marciniszyn, Mike" Cc: Michal Marek , "linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org" , "mmarcini@yahoo.com" On 07/08/13 09:15, Marciniszyn, Mike wrote: > >> You can say '%exclude /some/path' to exclude a path that would otherwise >> match an earlier pattern. But I do not know since when RPM supports this. If >> there is a risk of breaking make rpm on older systems, then let's leave it as is. > > This looks to be an RPM 4.0.3 feature. > > > I agree. > > Mike > rpm 4.0.3 is *ancient*. An %exclude is perfectly acceptable and definitely preferable to a broken payload. -- Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD http://people.redhat.com/dledford