Re: [PATCH 2/8] um: Do not use SUBARCH

Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-09-26T16:07:35Z

Richard Weinberger wrote:
> And, of course, this makes your patch valid.
> Can you also please ensure that your new defconfigs are minimal?

Yeah, it's close to a minimal configuration for the 3.10 kernel
(latest at the time of patch submission). I was aiming to minimize the
diff between the current defconfig and the two new defconfigs in
configs/. The slim diffstat does the talking:

arch/um/Kconfig.common | 5 -
arch/um/Makefile | 11 ++
arch/um/{defconfig => configs/i386_defconfig} | 209 +++++++++++++-------
arch/um/{defconfig => configs/x86_64_defconfig} | 250 +++++++++++++++---------
arch/x86/um/Kconfig | 5 +
5 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-)
copy arch/um/{defconfig => configs/i386_defconfig} (86%)
rename arch/um/{defconfig => configs/x86_64_defconfig} (83%)

If we find some deficiencies, we can always update it. For now, please
commit these two patches.

Thanks.