From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:65093 "EHLO mail-pb0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751329AbaBSGMa (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:12:30 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id jt11so17777832pbb.15 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:12:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <53044B35.3010203@converseincode.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:12:05 -0800 From: Behan Webster MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: linux-next References: <5303C695.4030403@converseincode.com> <20140219111753.23912fa4bdbfeba7aa6a6c52@canb.auug.org.au> <53041454.6090404@converseincode.com> <20140219060717.GA25806@ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20140219060717.GA25806@ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Michal Marek , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan-Simon_M=F6ller?= On 02/18/14 22:07, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >>>> The LLVMLinux project is working on changes to the LLVM/clang toolchain >>>> as well as to the linux kernel code in order to be able to compile the >>>> kernel with clang. >>> I have no objection to this, but would like to see more of these patches >>> reviewed by (among others) the kbuild guys (cc'd). I also could not find >>> some of these patches published on lkml (where I would expect to see >>> them). And the top patch has a very uninformative commit message :-( >> Of course. That is the intention. I'll review all the commit >> messages as well. > Please send the patches as least to linux-kbuild for review. > I almost never go hunting for patches in a git repo for review, > and this is the same for others. Yes. The plan is to send them to the list. Just haven't got to it yet. Sorry for the confusion. Like I said, at this point I was just asking about linux-next inclusion, and how that all worked. Behan -- Behan Webster behanw@converseincode.com