From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:64375 "EHLO mail-pb0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753977AbaBSSGJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:06:09 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id rq2so723136pbb.17 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:06:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5304F28D.5070604@converseincode.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:06:05 -0800 From: Behan Webster MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: linux-next References: <5303C695.4030403@converseincode.com> <20140219111753.23912fa4bdbfeba7aa6a6c52@canb.auug.org.au> <53041454.6090404@converseincode.com> <20140219060717.GA25806@ravnborg.org> <53044B35.3010203@converseincode.com> <20140219172223.9b107d24c1e5a708a1e3cece@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20140219172223.9b107d24c1e5a708a1e3cece@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Michal Marek , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan-Simon_M=F6ller?= On 02/18/14 22:22, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:12:05 -0800 Behan Webster wrote: >> Yes. The plan is to send them to the list. Just haven't got to it yet. >> Sorry for the confusion. >> >> Like I said, at this point I was just asking about linux-next inclusion, >> and how that all worked. > OK, I should have said that linux-next is for patches that have passed > review and unit testing and are essentially ready to go to Linus (or your > upstream tree). Then we're down to just the thinkpad ACPI nested functions patch which fits those criteria. I will remove the other patches (since they haven't been reviewed by the appropriate kernel community yet), and we will only add patches to that branch that satisfy those rules. Thanks, Behan -- Behan Webster behanw@converseincode.com