From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45789 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932701AbaFIW4Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:56:25 -0400 Message-ID: <53963B97.1060807@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:56:23 +0200 From: Michal Marek MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: rename CONFIG_SHELL to KBUILD_SHELL References: <1402317082-21184-1-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> <20140609181526.GA1414@ravnborg.org> <53961E26.5080704@suse.cz> <20140609211858.GA2025@ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20140609211858.GA2025@ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Masahiro Yamada , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Dne 9.6.2014 23:18, Sam Ravnborg napsal(a): > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:50:46PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: >> Dne 9.6.2014 20:15, Sam Ravnborg napsal(a): >>> And please cc: the x86 people - thay have some patches that >>> uses CONFIG_SHELL IIRC. >> >> Do you remember which patches? Looking at >> >> git diff kbuild/kbuild linux-next -- arch/x86 >> >> The only occurrence of CONFIG_SHELL is in the rule for make kvmconfig. >> Which is a conflict that is trivially solved. > Yep - these were the ones I had in mind. Thanks, this is a trivial conflict. I'll have one more look and apply the rename tomorrow. Michal