From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:32901 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754432AbbBRTo0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2015 14:44:26 -0500 Message-ID: <54E4EB98.2020407@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:44:24 +0100 From: Michal Marek MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Still some race in X509 certificates handling References: <417.1423829747@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <54E49BD2.1010503@suse.cz> <54E4A37D.1040202@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: David Howells , Linux Kbuild mailing list Dne 18.2.2015 v 19:49 Linus Torvalds napsal(a): > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 6:36 AM, Michal Marek wrote: >> >> Actually, I sent a patch for the "X.509 certificate list changed" >> message last October: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/8/306, please apply >> it. However, this is just a spurious rebuild. The cause for the >> signature verification error must be something else. > > So I saw the patch originally and it seemed a reasonable cleanup, but > you're the kbuild maintainer, so I always assumed it would come > through a standard kbuild pull. I assumed it would get through David's tree like other modsign patches, and I forgot about it later. David, is it OK to merge the patch through the kbuild tree? Thanks, Michal