From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:34946 "EHLO mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751961AbbIOE3R (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:29:17 -0400 Received: by pacfv12 with SMTP id fv12so167217005pac.2 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: llvmlinux: Set appropriate compiler-flag for CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE References: <1442287188-11326-1-git-send-email-sedat.dilek@gmail.com> <55F7931F.2020100@converseincode.com> From: Behan Webster Message-ID: <55F79E9A.40308@converseincode.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 22:29:14 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com Cc: Michal Marek , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, LKML On 09/14/15 22:07, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Behan Webster > wrote: >> I haven't upstreamed this patch yet because we are still characterizing its >> effects on other architectures. > Then embed this information into the changelog of *your* patch. It's in our tree/build system, as a work in progress. Which is why I haven't upstreamed it yet. > So what is *your* solution in case of CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y > (OptLevel '-Os' is wrong, '-Oz' is correct)? I don't have one yet, which is precisely why I haven't upstreamed it yet. Sedat, why don't you try working with us instead of making demands and accusing people? Behan -- Behan Webster behanw@converseincode.com