linux-kbuild.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip v5 2/5] kbuild: Add option to turn incompatible pointer check into error
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:52:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <565C9AE2.7040408@monom.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151130173842.GV26643@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi Paul,

On 11/30/2015 06:38 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:26:03PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On 11/30/2015 02:38 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>>> With the introduction of the simple wait API we have two very
>>> similar APIs in the kernel. For example wake_up() and swake_up()
>>> is only one character away. Although the compiler will warn
>>> happily the wrong usage it keeps on going an even links the kernel.
>>> Thomas and Peter would rather like to see early missuses reported
>>> as error early on.
>>>
>>> In a first attempt we tried to wrap all swait and wait calls
>>> into a macro which has an compile time type assertion. The result
>>> was pretty ugly and wasn't able to catch all wrong usages.
>>> woken_wake_function(), autoremove_wake_function() and wake_bit_function()
>>> are assigned as function pointers. Wrapping them with a macro around is
>>> not possible. Prefixing them with '_' was also not a real option
>>> because there some users in the kernel which do use them as well.
>>> All in all this attempt looked to intrusive and too ugly.
>>>
>>> An alternative is to turn the pointer type check into an error which
>>> catches wrong type uses. Obviously not only the swait/wait ones. That
>>> isn't a bad thing either. Though for the beginning let's introduce it
>>> as options in the kernel hacking section.
>>
>> The kbuild bot found one problem for allmodconfig. I just send a fix for
>> it ("regmap: Fix leftover from struct reg_default to struct reg_sequence
>> change").
>
> This will result in an updated series, correct?

Not necessarily. This patch just points very verbose the incorrect 
pointer usage in regmap_register_path() users with allmodconfig. This 
series itself should be okay (unless I missed something).

cheers,
daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-30 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-30 13:38 [PATCH tip v5 0/5] Simple wait queue support Daniel Wagner
2015-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH tip v5 1/5] wait.[ch]: Introduce the simple waitqueue (swait) implementation Daniel Wagner
2015-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH tip v5 2/5] kbuild: Add option to turn incompatible pointer check into error Daniel Wagner
2015-11-30 15:26   ` Daniel Wagner
2015-11-30 17:38     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-30 18:52       ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2016-01-27 12:03   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH tip v5 3/5] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq Daniel Wagner
2015-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH tip v5 4/5] rcu: Do not call rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() while holding rnp->lock Daniel Wagner
2015-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH tip v5 5/5] rcu: use simple wait queues where possible in rcutree Daniel Wagner
2016-01-27 12:08 ` [PATCH tip v5 0/5] Simple wait queue support Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=565C9AE2.7040408@monom.org \
    --to=wagi@monom.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).