From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
nathan@kernel.org, nsc@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
martin.lau@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, clm@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] resolve_btfids: Implement --patch_btfids
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 16:28:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b24678f-b2eb-4139-8fe1-0834c8c8b75a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bba828ccd8d2ef3871375809d56c8d66c161bc453f03df80090dc03cf31f50aa@mail.kernel.org>
On 12/30/25 4:26 PM, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
>> index 2cbc252259be..1269efa06853 100644
>> --- a/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
>> +++ b/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/main.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +static int patch_btfids(const char *btfids_path, const char *elf_path)
>> +{
>> + Elf_Scn *scn = NULL;
>> + FILE *btfids_file;
>> + size_t shdrstrndx;
>> + int fd, err = -1;
>> + Elf_Data *data;
>> + struct stat st;
>> + GElf_Shdr sh;
>> + char *name;
>> + Elf *elf;
>> +
>> + elf_version(EV_CURRENT);
>> +
>> + fd = open(elf_path, O_RDWR, 0666);
>> + if (fd < 0) {
>> + pr_err("FAILED to open %s: %s\n", elf_path, strerror(errno));
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + elf = elf_begin(fd, ELF_C_RDWR_MMAP, NULL);
>> + if (!elf) {
>> + close(fd);
>> + pr_err("FAILED cannot create ELF descriptor: %s\n", elf_errmsg(-1));
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> + err = 0;
>> +out:
>> + elf_end(elf);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>
> Should the file descriptor fd be closed here? Looking at elf_collect() and its
> cleanup in main(), the pattern is to call elf_end() and then close(fd)
> separately. Without close(fd), error paths that reach 'goto out' after
> successful open() and elf_begin() will leak the file descriptor.
Correct. I missed close(fd) on the happy path.
>
>
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/20608784032
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-31 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-31 0:07 [PATCH bpf-next v1] resolve_btfids: Implement --patch_btfids Ihor Solodrai
2025-12-31 0:26 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-12-31 0:28 ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b24678f-b2eb-4139-8fe1-0834c8c8b75a@linux.dev \
--to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nsc@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox